A reform as a cognitive category and a social practice

Annotation

Social institutions and structures tend to experience an objective need for changes. It is dictated by inability of a social system to function in its previous capacity and according to an established algorithm. One of the ways of systemic social change is reforms, which are usually initiated and directed by the government. The article is aimed both at analyzing existing scientific approaches to social reforms study, and at substantiating a new approach to understanding this social phenomenon. The work is based on socio-philosophical ideas contained in the works of V. I. Lenin, P. B. Struve, L. I. Abalkin, T. I. Oizerman, S. Huntington, A. Touraine. The use of comparative historical method, as well as methods of analogy and interpretation made it possible to propose an understanding of reformism as a special type of social practice focused on purposeful social change. The article substantiates an approach designed to identify only objective characteristics of the reform phenomenon, free from value judgments and metaphorical comparisons. In particular, reform is seen as a mode of social transformation. At the same time, it is fundamentally important that the government maintains control over any ongoing social changes, retains priority in choosing the objects of reform, the sequence of reform measures, the speed of their implementation, etc.

Keywords

• social change
• reform
• revolution
• regime
• power
• governing
• control
• elite
• quality
• interpretation
* click on a keyword to go to the search

References

1. Abalkin, L. I. Neispolzovannyy shans: poltora goda v pravitelstve [The chance missed: a year and a half in the government]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1991, 304 р.
2. Belyaeva, L. A. Stanovlenie smeshannoy ekonomiki v Rossii i transformatsiya sotsialnoy struktury obshchestva [The formation of a mixed economy in Russia, and the transformation of the social structure]. Smeshannaya ekonomika: sotsiokulturnye aspekty [Mixed economy: socio-cultural aspects]. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the RAS, Institute of Philosophy of the RAS; 1994, pp. 112–138.
3. Bovin, A. E. Reforma [Reform]. Bolshaya sovetskaya enciklopediya [Great Soviet Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya; 1975, vol. 22, pp. 58–59.
4. Bystrova, A. S. Vozmozhnosti i predely antikorruptsionnykh reform v Rossii [The possibilities and limits of anti-corruption reforms in Russia]. Vlast i elity v rossiyskoy transformatsii [Power and Elites in the Russian Transformation]. Saint Petersburg: Intersocis; 2005, pp. 175–193.
5. Delyusin, L. P. Kitay: polveka – dve epokhi [China: half a century – two eras]. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS; 2001, 294 р.
6. Efremenko, D. V., Dolgov, A. Yu., Evseeva, Ya. V. Rossiya mezhdu sistemnymi katastrofami i evolyutsionnymi transformatsiyami: politiko-ontologicheskie aspekty [Russia between systemic catastrophes and evolutionary transformations: Political and ontological aspects]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [The policy. Political research]. 2017, no. 5, pp. 24–42, doi: 10.17976/jpps/2017.05.03.
7. Kravchenko, I. I. Reforma [Reform]. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 tomakh [New Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 4 vols]. Moscow: Mysl; vol. 3, p. 450.
8. Lenin, V. I. Kak ne sleduet pisat rezolyutsiy [How not to write resolutions]. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 55 tomakh [Complete works: in 55 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1972, vol. 15, pp. 89–112.
9. Lenin, V. I. Po povodu yubileya [On the anniversary]. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 55 tomakh [Complete works: in 55 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1973, vol. 20, pp. 161–170.
10. Oizerman, T. I. Opravdanie revizionizma. Izbrannye trudy: v 5 tomakh [Justification of revisionism. Selected works: in 5 vols]. Moscow: Nauka; 2014, vol. 3, 741 p.
11. Struve, P. B. Kriticheskie zametki k voprosu ob ekonomicheskom razvitii Rossii [Critical Notes on the economic development of Russia]. Saint Petersburg: Tipography by I. N. Skorokhodov; 1894, 291 р.
12. Struve, P. B. Lev Tolstoy. Patriotica. Politika, kultura, religiya, sotsializm. Sbornik statey za pyat let (1905–1910 gg.) [Patriotica. Politics, culture, religion, socialism. Collection of articles for five years (1905–1910)]. Saint Petersburg: Publ. House of D. E. Zhukovsky; 1911, pp. 531–555.
13. Menyayushchayasya sotsialnost: novye formy modernizatsii i progressa [Changing sociality: new forms of modernization and progress]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the RAS; 2010, 274 р.
14. Shishkina, V. I. Dialektika evolyutsii i revolyutsii v obshchestvennom razvitii (alternativnye kontseptsii). [Dialectics of evolution and revolution in social development (alternative concepts)].
    Istoricheskiy protsess: istoki, peripetii, perspektivy [Dialectics of evolution and revolution in social development (alternative concepts)]. Moscow, Yoshkar-Ola: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Mari State Technical University; 2003, iss. 4, pp. 45–56.
15. Huntington, S. P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1996, 367 р.
16. Modernization in China: the Effects of its People and Economic Development. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press; 2004, 249 р.
17. Touraine, A. Modernity and Cultural Specificities. International Social Science Journal. 1988, no. 18, pp. 443–457.
18. Wu, J. Understanding and Interpreting Chinese Economic Reform. Ohio: Thomson, South-Western; 2005, 480 р.
19. Yang, D. L. Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market Transition and the Politic of Governance in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2004, 432 р.

Popular articles