The project of negative anthropology in Giorgio Agamben’s philosophy

Annotation

The aim of this study is to analyze the concept of negative anthropology in Giorgio Agamben’s philosophy, with a particular focus on the deconstruction of the categories of inoperativity (inoperosità) and potentiality (potentia) as central elements of his critique of the Western metaphysical tradition. Unlike classical anthropological models that constitute the subject through active or essential characteristics, Agamben proposes an alternative perspective in which human being is revealed through the capacity “not” to actualize its potentiality but to retain it in the mode of pure possibility. This idea gains relevance in the context of digital control and the ideology of hyper-productivity. Agamben’s critique of the apparatus of activity demonstrates that inoperativity is not a passive state but rather a primordial existential dimension of human existence. In this framework, inoperativity assumes not a negative but a constitutive role: it creates a space for an alternative experience of time and being, allowing the subject to remain in the mode of potentiality rather than forced actualization. Inoperativity thus emerges as a form of resistance to functional necessity, enabling a radical rethinking of the ontology of action and inaction. A key concept in Agamben’s philosophy is “potentiality-not-to” (potenza-di-non), which contrasts with traditional ontological and political paradigms that define the subject through action. “Potentiality-not-to” expresses not merely the capacity to act but also the ability to hold oneself in a state of unrealized possibility, enabling the subject to remain outside predetermined functionality. For Agamben, true freedom manifests not in the coercive realization of potential but in the capacity to preserve it in a state of incompleteness. This renders human existence fundamentally open, excluding teleological closure or predetermination. In this context, Agamben’s negative anthropology does not simply reject traditional categories of subjectivity but also proposes a new ethics of immanence, where freedom is realized not through action but through a radical suspension. This suspension creates the conditions for alternative forms of being, grounded in the refusal of instrumentalized productivity.

Keywords

• Giorgio Agamben
• negative anthropology
• potentiality (potentia)
• immanent negativity
• biopolitics
• idleness (inoperosità)
• animal
• deprivation
• freedom
• weakness
• university
* click on a keyword to go to the search

References

1. Agamben, Dzh. Gryadushchee soobshchestvo [The coming community]. Moscow: Tri kvadrata; 2008, 144 p.
2. Agamben, Dzh. Ostavsheesya vremya: Kommentarii k Poslaniyu k Rimlyanam [The Remaining Time: A Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2018, 224 p.
3. Agamben, Dzh. Potentsiya mysli [The potency of thought]. Versus. 2023, no. 2, pp. 6–23.
4. Agamben, Dzh. Sredstva bez tseli: Zametki o politike [Means without end: notes on politics]. Moscow: Gileya; 2015, 366 p.
5. Aristotel. Sochineniya: v 4 tomakh [Works: in 4 vols.]. Moscow: Mysl; 1976, vol. 1, 550 p.
6. Batler, Dzh. Zametki k performativnoy teorii sobraniya [Notes towards a performative theory of assembly]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2018, 248 p.
7. Veber, M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma [The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism]. Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Vebe, M. Selected works]. Moscow: Progress; 1990, 808 p.
8. Evstropov, M. N. “Lyuboe”: ontologicheskii manerizm Dzhordzho Agambena [“Anything”: the ontological mannerism of Giorgio Agamben]. Vestnik KrasGAU [The Bulletin of KrasGAU]. 2014, no. 12, pp. 291–296.
9. Prozumentik, K. V. Siate Inoperosi: poetika bezdeistviya Dzhordzho Agambena [Siate Inoperosi: The Poetics of Inaction Giorgio Agambena]. Vestnik Permskogo natsionalnogo issledovatelskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. Kultura, istoriya, filosofiya, pravo [Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Culture, history, philosophy, Law]. 2018, no. 4, pp. 7–19, doi: 10.15593/perm.kipf/2018.4.01.
10. Riker, P. Konflikt interpretatsii. Ocherki o germenevtike [Conflict of interpretations. Essays on hermeneutics]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; 2008, 695 p.
11. Sartr, Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto: opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii [Being and nothingness: the experience of phenomenological ontology]. Moscow: Respublika; 2000, 639 p.
12. Farafonova, D. “Um, okunayushchii pero v chernila mysli”: k voprosu o perevode na russkiy yazyk termina potenza i o ego znachenii v ontologii Dzhordzho Agambena [“The mind dipping the pen in the ink of thought”: towards the question of the translation of the term potenza and its meaning in Giorgio Agamben's ontology]. Versus. 2023, no. 2, pp. 151–164.
13. Kharauei, D. Ostavayas so smutoy:  Zavodit' sorodichei v Khtulutsene [Staying with confusion: Making kin in Htulutsen]. Perm: Hyle Press; 2021, 347 p.
14. Butler, J. P. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routlege; 1990, 221 p.
15. Lewis, T. E. The Architecture of Potentiality: Weak Utopianism and Educational Space in the Work of Giorgio Agamben. Utopian Studies. 2012, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 355–373, doi: 10.5325/utopianstudies.23.2.0355.
16. Mignolo, W. D. Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom. Theory, Culture and Society. 2009, vol. 26 (7–8), pp. 159–181.
17. Ruda, F. Indifference and Repetition; or, Modern Freedom and Its Discontents Indifference and Repetition. New York: Fordham University Press; 2023, 224 р.

Popular articles