Systemic foundations of the legitimacy of political power

Systemic foundations of the legitimacy of political power

Annotation

Creating conditions for maintaining the legitimacy of political power is one of the most important issues in modern political science, as it creates the basis for maintaining the stability of the political system without the need to resort to legitimate violence. In the conditions of uncertainty that characterize the environment of modern political systems, addressing this issue is filled with new meaning. The purpose of this article is to analyze the systemic foundations of the legitimacy of political power using the legacy of the outstanding American political scientist D. Easton. A systems approach was used as the theoretical and methodological basis for the study, which allows considering legitimacy as an element of the political system necessary to maintain its stability and sustainability. Easton's ideas about the legitimacy of political power are compared with M. Weber's concept of political domination. D. Easton's main works on systems analysis and behavioralism, as well as modern studies on the legitimacy of power, were selected as scientific sources. The results of the study show that from the point of view of the systems approach, the following bases of legitimacy are distinguished: ideological, personal and structural. Easton's theory of the political system confirms the importance of political socialization (politicization) and support (trust), thus guaranteeing the preservation of the stability of the system. In the course of the study, limitations of D. Easton's concept of the legitimacy of power were identified, since excessive schematization leads to the reduction of complex political processes. Also, for a full analysis of the mechanisms of legitimization, it is necessary to integrate the normative and empirical foundations of political science. Despite this, Easton's concept of legitimacy retains its relevance and can be used to analyze modern problems of the legitimacy of political power.

Keywords

References

  1. Golovenkin, E. N. Sistemnyy podkhod Devida Istona: opyt sozdaniya politicheskoj teorii [David Easton's Systems Approach: An Essay on Creating Political Theory]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12 “Politicheskie nauki” [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 12 “Political sciences”]. 2015, no. 5, pp. 38–53.
  2. Easton, D. The Political System Besieged by the State. Political Theory. 1981, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 303–325.
  3. Easton, D. The New Revolution in Political Science. The American Political Science Review. 1969, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1051–1061.
  4. Easton, D. A systems analysis of political life. New York, London, Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1965, 507 p.
  5. Easton, D. An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems. World Politics. 1957, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 383–400.
  6. Easton, D. Traditional and Behavioral Research in American Political Science. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1957, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 110–115.
  7. Easton, D. The political system: an inquiry into the state of political science. New York: Knopf; 1953, 320 p.
  8. Easton, D. The Decline of Modern Political Theory. The Journal of Politics. 1951, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 36–58.
  9. Gunnel, J. The reconstitution of political theory: David Easton, behavioralism, and the long road to system. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 2013, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 190–210.
  10. Hobhouse, L. T., Cole, G. D. H., Mitrany, D. Pluralist Democracy in International Relations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018, 268 p.
  11. Stout, M. Logics of legitimacy: three traditions of public administration praxis. New York, London: Routledge; 2013, 325 p.
  12. Trilling, R. Easton’s concept of effective support: two formal models. Comparative Political Studies. 1972, vol. 4, iss. 4, pp. 491–507.
  13. Weber, M. Economy and Society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkley: University of California Press; 1978, 1462 p.
Article information
History
Authors
Citation
Ignatjeva O. A. Systemic foundations of the legitimacy of political power. Kaspiyskiy region: politika, ekonomika, kultura [The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture]. 2025, no. 2 (83), pp. 76–84. https://doi.org/10.54398/1818-510Х.2025.83.2.009.
License

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

* is not an advertisement
* click on a keyword to go to the search