Civil religion as an identity factor

Civil religion as an identity factor

Annotation

The article is devoted to the phenomenon of civil religion. This concept explains the emergence of important symbolic value systems in the modern world, which are centered on such concepts as “nation”, “people”, “ethnos” and other ethnic and social groups. The article examines the concept of civil religion, its transformation in the modern world during the processes of globalization and glocalization. A number of elements of civil religion that are associated with the modern picture of identity, including Russian, Kalmyk and Oirat, are analyzed. The theoretical basis of the research was the scientific publications of domestic and Western scientists devoted to civil religion. The article uses general scientific methods - analysis, evaluative-descriptive (descriptive) and comparative-historical. The modern Kalmyk identity is inextricably linked with Buddhism, which occupies a traditional place in society, forming key ritual practices and symbolism, and unites the ethnic group. Having replaced traditional religion as an important factor in the integration of society, civil religion was initially aimed at shaping the value of the nation, national feeling. However, at present, the abstract concept of the nation is being replaced by a more complex picture of identities, including social, professional, and ethnic identities. The blurring of national borders leads to the fact that the phenomenon of civil religion can now be traced in various communities that surround themselves with symbolic systems, and therefore with symbols and rituals that are part of a “cult” designed to affirm the value of this community.

Keywords

Contribution of the authors

Koltsov P. M. – scientific management, development of the research concept, substantiation of the purpose of the article, writing the original text; Umgaev S. A. – development of the research concept, processing and analysis of the material, text revision; Nadbitov M. V. – scientific text editing, final conclusions.

Acknowledgments

the study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Scientific Foundation No. 23-28-10065, “The modern structure of ethnic, religious and civic identity of the Kalmyks in ritual and commemorative practices” (https://rscf.ru/23-28-10065/).

References

  1. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva [Imaginary communities]. Moscow: Canon-Press-C; 2001, 289 p.
  2. Gellner, E. Natsii i natsionalizm [Nations and nationalism]. Moscow: Progress; 1991, 319 p.
  3. Dyurkgeim, E. Elementarnye formy religioznoi zhizni. Totemicheskaya sistema v Avstralii [Elementary forms of religious life. The totemic system in Australia]. Moscow: Delo; 2018, 738 p.
  4. Egorov, V. A. Grazhdanskaya religiya v sovremennoy Rossii i ee elementy [Civil Religion in modern Russia and its elements]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina [Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin]. 2021, no. 1, pp. 113–123, doi: 10.35231/18186653_2021_1_113.
  5. Zadorozhnyuk, I. E. Grazhdanskaya religiya v SShA, ili “Vera v Ameriku”: sotsialnye funktsii, istoriya i sovremennost [Civil Religion in the USA, or “Faith in America”: social functions, history and modernity]. Moscow: SSU; 2007, 354 p.
  6. Legoida, V. R. Simvoly i ritualy v politicheskikh protsessakh v SShA: traditsii i sovremennost (fenomen “grazhdanskoi religii”) [Symbols and Rituals in political Processes in the USA: Traditions and Modernity (the phenomenon of “civil religion”)] Cand. Political. sci. diss. Abstr. Moscow: MGIMO; 2000, 31 p.
  7. Musulmane v Britanii nachali “navodit poryadok” [Muslims in Britain began to “restore order”]. Available at: https://rg.ru/2024/08/14/po-zakonam-shariata.html?ysclid=m27
    gcqz1d6589963948 (accessed: 15.08.2024).
  8. Storchak, V. M. Grazhdanskaya religiya [Civil Religion]. Moscow: ATISO; 2011, 234 p.
  9. Khantington, S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii [The Clash of Civilizations]. Moscow: AST; 2003, 603 p.
  10. Khobsbaum E. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 goda [Nations and nationalism after 1780]. St. Petersburg: Aleteya; 1998, 308 p.
  11. Bellah, R. N. Civil Religion in America. Daedalus. 1967, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 1–21.
  1. Bellah, R. N. American Civil Religion in the 1970s (augmented version). American civil religion. Ed. by R. E. Richey, D. G. Jones. New York: Harper & Row, 1974, pp. 255–272.
  2. Bellah, R. N. Durkheim and History. Emile Durkheim: Critical Assessment. London: Routledge; 1974, vol. 7, pp. 36–56
  3. Beyer, P. Globalization and Glocalization. Sage handbook of the sociology of religion. London: Sage; 2007, pp. 98–118.
  4. Bottici, C., Challand, B. Rethinking Political Myth: The Clash of Civilizations as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. European Journal of Social Theory. 2006, no. 9 (3), pp. 315–336.
  5. Copsey, N. The English Defence League: Challenging our country and our values of social inclusion, fairness and equality. London: Faith Matters; 2010, 37 р.
  6. Cristi, M. Durkheim’s Political Sociology: Civil Religion, Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism. Holy Nations and Global Identities: Civil Religion, Nationalism, and Globalisation. Leiden: Brill; 2009, pp. 47–78.
  7. Crook, T. Civil religion and the History of Democratic Modernity: Probing the limits of the sacred and the secular. Religion Compass. 2010, no. 4 (6), pp. 376–387.
  8. Hedetoft, U. Nationalism as civil religion and rituals of belonging before and after the global turn. Holy Nations and Global Identities: Civil Religion, Nationalism, and Globalisation. Leiden: Brill; 2009, pp. 253–270.
  9. Hvithamar, A., Warburg, M. Introducing Civil Religion, Nationalism and Globalisation. Holy Nations and Global Identities: Civil Religion, Nationalism, and Globalisation. Leiden: Brill; 2009, pp. 1–20.
  10. Kitinov, В. U. The Kalmyk Identity in the 21st Century: Are the Ethnic, Religious and Language Backgrounds the Important Matters? Oirat and Kalmyk Identity in the 20th and 21st Century. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen; 2010, pp. 249–262.
  11. Parsons, G. From Nationalism to Internationalism: Civil religion and the Festival of Saint Catherine of Siena, 1940–2003. Journal of Church and State. 2004, no. 46 (4), pp. 861–885.
Article information
History
Authors
Citation
Koltsov P. M., Umgaev S. A., Nadbitov M. V. Civil religion as an identity factor. Kaspiyskiy region: politika, ekonomika, kultura [The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture]. 2024, no. 4 (81), pp. 211–219. https://doi.org/10.54398/1818-510Х.2024.81.4.020.
License

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

* is not an advertisement
* click on a keyword to go to the search