Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Conseptualisation of Migration Diplomacy in Contemporary International Relations

Annotation

The article examines migration diplomacy as an independent output of states’ foreign policy activity in the context of the growing politisation of cross-border mobility and the securitisation of migration processes. The relevance of the study stems from the need for a theoretical understanding of the practices through which migration issues are used as an instrument of interstate interaction, as illustrated by the EU agreements with Turkey (2016) and Serbia (2022), as well as the instrumentalisation of migrants in Morocco (2021). The aim of the paper is to advance theoretical and methodological approaches in analysing migration diplomacy through the systemisation of existing concepts and their further interpretation through within the framework of international relations theory. The methodological foundations of the research comprise of comparative analysis method, conceptual modeling, and elements of discourse analysis. The source base encompasses contemporary publications on migration and international relations, as well as materials from bilateral and multilateral agreements. As a result, the paper provides a systematised evolution of the concept, from empirical observations to the notion of “migration power”. The limitations of classical approaches (realism, liberalism, and constructivism) in explaining the complex nature of migration diplomacy are indicated. It is argued that the analytical tools of the English School of international relations – namely the concept of “international society”, the debate between solidarists and pluralists, and the theory of primary institutions – provide the most comprehensive framework for revealing the dual nature of migration diplomacy, which combines elements of coercion and cooperation. The proposed approach outlines a promising direction for examining the role of migration in the context of the transformation of the international society.

Keywords

• migration diplomacy
• international relations
• migration power
• the English School of international relations,
• international society
• securitisation of migration
• foreign policy tools
• global migration governance
• migration
• migration policy
* click on a keyword to go to the search

References

1. Korobov, A. A. Gosudarstvennaya migratsionnaya politika stran EKOVAS: osnovnye napravleniya i tendentsii [State Migration Policy of ECOWAS Countries: Main Directions and Trends]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya «Sotsiologiya. Politologiya» [Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology]. 2024, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 459–466, doi: 10.18500/1818-9601-2024-24-4-459-466.
2. Mironov, V. V. Debaty mezhdu plyuralistami i solidaristami v Angliyskoy shkole mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy na rubezhe XX–XXI vv. [Debates between Pluralists and Solidarists in the English School of International Relations at the Turn of the 20th–21st Centuries]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya [Tomsk State University Journal of History]. 2018, no. 53, pp. 64–68, doi: 10.17223/19988613/53/13.
3. Nelegaly v ispanskoy Seute: kak migranty prevratilis v instrument davleniya? [Illegals in Spanish Ceuta: How did Migrants Become an Instrument of Pressure?]. Available at: https://tass.ru/opinions/11435653 (accessed: 12.02.2026).
4. Potemkina, O. Yu. Globalnyy dogovor o migratsii – uspekh ili proval? [Global Compact for Migration – Success or Failure?]. Nauchno-analiticheskiy vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN [Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS]. 2018, no. 6, pp. 86–91, doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran620188691.
5. Tsapenko, I. P., Subkhangulova, K. A. Tsentry migratsionnoy sily v mirovoy politike [Centers of Migration Power in World Politics]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2025, no. 8, pp. 58–70, doi: 10.7868/S3034520025080064.
6. Adamson, F. B., Tsourapas, G. Migration diplomacy in world politics. International Studies Perspectives. 2019, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 113–128, doi: 10.1093/isp/eky015.
7. Adamson, F. B., Triadafilopoulos, T., Zolberg, A. R. The Limits of the Liberal State: Migration, Identity and Belonging in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2011, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 843–859, doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2011.576188.
8. Barnett, M., Duvall, R. Power in International Politics. International Organization. 2005, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 39–75, doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050010.
9. Buzan, B. From international system to international society: structural realism and regime theory meet the English school. International Organization. 1993, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 327–352, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027983.
10. EU-Turkey Statement & Action Plan. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-towards-a-new-policy-on-migration/file-eu-turkey-statement-action-plan?sid=9901 (accessed: 02.02.2026).
11. Fernández-Molina, I., Tsourapas, G. Understanding migration power in international studies. International Affairs. 2024, vol. 100, iss. 6, pp. 2461–2479, doi: 10.1093/ia/iiae230.
12. Fine, S. Migration, political philosophy, and the real world. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2017, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 719–725, doi: 10.1080/13698230.2016.1231793.
13. Greenhill, K. M. Strategic Engineered Migration as a Weapon of War. Civil Wars, 2008, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–21, doi: 10.1080/13698240701835425.
14. Jaskulowski, K. The securitisation of migration: Its limits and consequences. International Political Science Review. 2019, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 710–720, doi: 10.1177/0192512118799755.
15. Laube, L. Diplomatic side-effects of the EU’s externalization of border control and the emerging role of «transit states» in migration diplomacy. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung. 2021, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 78–105, doi: 10.12759/hsr.46.2021.3.78-105.
16. Lavenex, S., Piper, N. Regions and global migration governance: Perspectives ‘from above’, ‘from below’ and ‘from beyond’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2022, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 2837–2854, doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2021.1972564.
17. Thiollet, H. Migration as Diplomacy: Labor Migrants, Refugees, and Arab Regional Politics in the Oil-Rich Countries. International Labor and Working-Class History. 2011, no. 79, pp. 103–121, doi: 10.1017/S0147547910000293.
18. Tolay, J. Interrogating and Broadening the Emerging Narrative on Migration Diplomacy: A Critical Assessment. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2022, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 354–375, doi: 10.1177/03058298221139589.
19. Tsourapas, G. Migration diplomacy in the Global South: cooperation, coercion and issue linkage in Gaddafi’s Libya. Third World Quarterly. 2017, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2367–2385, doi: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1350102.
20. Ullah, A. K. M. A. Migration as international relations. Global Networks. 2025, vol. 25, no. 3, p. e70016, doi: 10.1111/glob.70016.
21. Vaagland, K. How strategies of refugee host states are perceived by donor states: EU interpretations of Jordanian migration diplomacy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2023, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 3085–3100, doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2023.2193715.
22. Visvizi, A., Pachocka, M., Lytras, M. D. Managing international migration: rethinking transaction costs, red tape, and their impact. International Migration. 2019, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 271–279, doi: 10.1111/imig.12648.
23. Western Balkans route. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/western-balkans-route/ (accessed: 02.02.2026).

Popular articles