The Phenomenon of the Banalization of Heroism in Contemporary Culture

Annotation

In the post-heroic culture of the 20th and 21st centuries, heroism is losing its status as an exceptional event and is increasingly constructed as a reproducible media image, meme, or brand, giving rise to the phenomenon of its banalization. The object of this study is the contemporary culture of heroism. The subject is the phenomenon of the banalization of heroism and its conceptualization in philosophy and science. This research draws on a historical, philosophical, and conceptual analysis of the works of Hannah Arendt, Martin Leibovici, Mary Morris, Zinaida Franco, Frederick Zimbardo, Stuart T. Ellison, and others, as well as on the methodology of critical theory for analyzing the culture industry and symbolic exchange. The results of empirical and interdisciplinary studies of heroism are additionally utilized. It is shown that “banality” in Arendt, Morris, and Zimbardo describes a mode of relationship to the sociocultural environment characterized by automatism, routine, and the loss of a critical dimension, while “banalization” captures the process of reducing complex phenomena to clichés and repeatable forms. Banalization reflects the migration of heroism from the realm of the transcendent / exceptional to the realm of everyday practices (“heroic imagination”) and institutionalization (“the science of heroism”). A comparative analysis of the perception of the hero in individualistic (USA) and collectivist (China) cultures demonstrates how heroism is imbued with different cultural content while preserving a universal core of rational-volitional traits. A critical analysis of empirical research has revealed two forms of contemporary heroism: the “banal,” situationally determined act of an ordinary person, and the “non-banal,” rooted in stable and diverse types of moral personality. A distinction is made between banalization-reduction, where heroism is reduced to a single impulse and loses its connection with a stable moral character, and banalization-democratization, which reveals the heroic as potentially accessible to everyone in everyday life.

Keywords

• banalization of heroism
• post-heroic culture
• ethos
• moral personality
• situationism
• comparative studies
* click on a keyword to go to the search

References

1. Arendt, H. Banalnost zla. Eykhman v Ierusalime [The Banality of Evil: Eichmann in Jerusalem]. Moscow: Yevropa; 2008, 424 p.
2. Voloshin, V. V. Mem i memetika: epistemologicheskiy rakurs [Meme and Memetics: An Epistemological Perspective]. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [News of Tula State University. Humanities]. 2023, no. 1, pp. 224–237, doi: 10.24412/2071-6141-2023-1-224-237.
3. Kolozaridi, P. Mem o besslavii [The Meme of Disgrace]. Logos [Logos]. 2016, vol. 26, no. 6 (115), pp. 219–235.
4. Allison, S. T. The initiation of heroism science. Heroism Science. 2015, vol. 1, iss. 1, art. 1, doi: 10.26736/hs.2016.01.01.
5. Allison, S. T. The Quiet Heroism of Finding the Extraordinary in the Ordinary. Encyclopedia of Heroism Studies. New York: Springer, Cham; 2024, pp. 863–869, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-17125-3_541-1.
6. Allison, S. T., Goethals, G. R., Kramer, R. M. Handbook of Heroism and Heroic Leadership. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2016, 594 p., doi: 10.4324/9781315690100.
7. Bai, J. Logos and ethos: Heroism and social building in China. Heroism Science. 2022, vol. 7, no. 1, art. 4, doi: 10.26736/hs.2022.01.07.
8. Doris, J. M. Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002, 288 р.
9. Flanagan, O. Varieties of moral personality: Ethics and psychological realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1991, 393 p., doi: 10.4159/9780674036956.
10. Franco, Z., Zimbardo, P. The banality of heroism. Greater Good. 2007, vol. 3, pp. 30–35.
11. Goethals, G., Allison, S. Making Heroes: The Construction of Courage, Competence, and Virtue. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2012, vol. 46, pp. 183–235, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00004-0.
12. Harman, G. No Character or Personality. Business Ethics Quarterly. 2003, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 87–94, doi: 10.5840/beq20031316.
13. Leibovici, M. Banality of Evil (The), Mass Violence & Résistance. 3 November, 2007. Available at: http://bo-k2s.sciences-po.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/en/document/banality-evil (accessed: 17.05.2021).
14. Morris, M. Banality in Cultural Studies. Discourse. 1988, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 3–29.
15. Sharma, S., Kulkarni, A., Suresh, T., Mathur, H., Nakov, P., Akhtar, M. S., Chakraborty, T. Characterizing the Entities in Harmful Memes: Who is the Hero, the Villain, the Victim? Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Dubrovnik, Croatia: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2023, pp. 2149–2163.
16. Sun, Y., Kinsella, E. L., Igou, E. R. On Cultural Differences of Heroes: Evidence From Individualistic and Collectivistic Cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2023, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 841–856, doi: 10.1177/01461672221150238.
17. Walker, L. J., Frimer, J. A., Dunlop, W. L. Varieties of moral personality: beyond the banality of heroism. Journal of personality. 2010, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 907–942.
18. Zhou, M. Three Faces of Heroism: An Empirical Study of Indirect Literary Translation Between Chinese-English-Portuguese of Wuxia Fiction. Corpus-based Studies across Humanities. 2024, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 157–186, doi: 10.1515/csh-2024-0009.
19. Zimbardo, P. G. The Lucifer Effect. Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks; 2007, 576 p.

Popular articles