Political clientelism as a subject of a neopatrimonial analysis

Annotation

The main question posed by the author of this article is the correlation of the categories “neopatrimonialism” and “political clientelism” and the legitimacy of their identification in the works of modern scientists. As a hypothesis, the thesis is put forward that these terms mean various forms of political organization that can combine or compete with each other. To prove this hypothesis, the following tasks were solved: 1) analysis of key publications on the topic of political clientelism; 2) study of the possibilities of the neopatrimonial approach as a method of analyzing client-patronage systems; 3) critical analysis of various definitions of the terms “patrimonialism”, “neopatrimonialism”, “clientelism”, “patronage” and a number of others; 4) identification of the interrelationships between neopatrimonialism, political clientelism and the results of the political development of individual states. The research focuses on models of client-patronage relations typical of post-communist Russia. For their scientific analysis, the author uses the concepts of “state capture”, “patronage presidency”, “redistributive neopatrimonialism” and others. As a result, conclusions are drawn about the need for a deep revision of existing ideas about the interrelationships between neopatrimonialism, political clientelism and the state of key state institutions, the functioning of which is determined by a combination of formal principles and informal management practices determined by the cultural and historical traditions of the country and the personal qualities of political leaders.

Keywords

• political clientelism
• prebendalism
• nepotism
• patrimonialism
• neopatrimonialism
• “political machine”
• “patronage presidency”
• M. Weber
• J.-F. Medar
• M. N. Afanasyev
• G. Hale
• N. Robinson
* click on a keyword to go to the search

References

1. Afanasev, M. N. Klientelizm i rossiyskaya gosudarstvennost: Issledovanie klientarnykh otnosheniy [Clientelism and Russian statehood: A study of client relations]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Moscow Public Scientific Foundation; 2000, 318 p.
2. Voslenskiy, M. S. Nomenklatura. Gospodstvuyushchiy klass Sovetskogo Soyuza [Nomenclature. The ruling Class of the Soviet Union]. Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya, Oktyabr; 1991, 624 p.
3. Vybory v Gosudarstvennuju Dumu Federalnogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 1999 g. [Elections to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation in 1999]. Available at: http://old.cikrf.ru/banners/vib_arhiv/gosduma/1999/index.html (accessed: 10.09.2025).
4. Vybory Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2000 g. [Election of the President of the Russian Federation in 2000]. Available at: http://www.cikrf.ru/banners/vib_arhiv/president/2000 / (accessed: 11.09.2025).
5. Gilev, A. Vvedenie. Chernye koshki v temnykh komnatakh: issledovaniya politicheskogo patronazha v obshchestvennykh i gumanitarnykh naukakh [Introduction. Black cats in dark rooms: Studies of Political Patronage in the Social Sciences and Humanities]. Patron-klientskie otnoshenija v istorii i sovremennosti [Patron-client relations in History and modernity]. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya; 2016, pp. 6–40.
6. Davydov, Yu. N. Maks Veber i sovremennaya teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya: Aktualnye problemy veberovskogo sotsiologicheskogo uchenija [Max Weber and modern theoretical sociology: Current problems of Weber's sociological teaching]. Moscow: Martis; 1998, 509 p.
7. Makarkin, A. Partiynaya sistema sovremennoy Rossii i nachalo krizisa [The party system of modern Russia and the beginning of the crisis]. Neprikosnovennyy zapas [An inviolable reserve]. 2009, no. 1 (63), pp. 125–136.
8. Maslovskiy, M. V. Teoriya byurokratii Maksa Vebera i sovremennaya politicheskaya sotsiologiya [Max Weber's theory of bureaucracy and modern political sociology]. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University; 1997, 51 p.
9. Pavlov-Silvanskiy N. P. Feodalizm v Rossii [Feudalism in Russia]. Ed. by S. O. Schmidt. Moscow: Nauka; 1988, 690 p.
10. Patron-klientskie otnosheniya v istorii i sovremennosti [Patron-client relations in History and modernity]. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya; 2016, 415 p.
11. Federalnyy zakon ot 11 dekabrya 2004 g. N 159-FZ “O vnesenii izmeneniy v Federalnyy zakon “Ob obshchih principakh organizatsii zakonodatelnykh (predstavitelnykh) i ispolnitelnykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti subektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii” i v Federalnyy zakon “Ob osnovnykh garantiyakh izbiratelnykh prav i prava na uchastie v referendume grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii” (s izmenenijami i dopolnenijami) [Federal Law No. 159-FZ of December 11, 2004 “On Amendments to the Federal Law “On General Principles of Organization of Legislative (Representative) and Executive Bodies of State Power of Subjects of the Russian Federation” and to the Federal Law “On Basic Guarantees of Electoral Rights and the Right to Participate in a Referendum citizens of the Russian Federation” (with amendments and additions)]. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/12137945/?ysclid=m49xnm28ks928356575 (accessed: 14.09.2025).
12. Federalnyy zakon ot 5 avgusta 2000 g. N 113-FZ “O porjadke formirovaniya Soveta Federatsii Federalnogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [Federal Law No. 113-FZ of August 5, 2000 "On the Procedure for the Formation of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation"]. Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_28087/?ysclid=m49x6zrnta92359946 (accessed: 15.09.2025).
13. Fisun, A. K pereosmysleniyu postsovetskoy politiki: neopatrimonialnaya interpretatsiya [Rethinking post-Soviet Politics: a neopatrimonial interpretation]. Politicheskaya kontseptologiya [Political Conceptology]. 2010, no. 4, pp. 158–187.
14. Chayko, I. V. Etapy konstitutsionnoy reformy [Stages of constitutional reform]. Kachinskie chteniya [Kaczynski readings]. Moscow: Kachinets Aviator Support Fundation; 2010, iss. 13–14, pp. 179–192.
15. Bach, D. Patrimonialism and Neopatrimonialism: Comparative Trajectories and Readings. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics. 2011, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 275–294, doi: 10.1080/14662043.2011.582731.
16. Bonga, G. W. Exploring the Impact of Neopatrimonialism Dominance in Africa. Dynamic Research Journals – Journal of Economics and Finance. 2021, vol. 6, no 1, pp. 17–23.
17. Bratton, M., van de Walle, N. Democratic Experiments in Africa. Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997, 330 p.
18. Clapham, C. Clientelism and the state. Private Patronage and Public Power. Ed. by C. Clapham. London: Frances Pinter; 1982, pp. 1–35.
19. David-Barrett, E. State capture and development: a conceptual framework. Journal of International Relations and Development. 2023, vol. 26, pp. 224–244, doi: 10.1057/s41268-023-00290-6.
20. Easter, G. M. Reconstructing The State. Personal Networks and Elite Identity in Soviet Russia. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000, 221 p., doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511571527.
21. Eisenstadt, S. N. Traditional Patrimonialism and Modern Neopatrominialism. London; Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1973, 95 p.
22. Erdmann, G., Engel, U. Neopatrimonialism Reconsidered: Critical Review and Elaboration of an Elusive Concept. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics. 2007, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 95–119, doi: 10.1080/14662040601135813.
23. Hale, H. Eurasian Polities as Hybrid Regimes: The Case of Putin's Russia. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2010, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 33–41, doi: 10.1016/j.euras.2009.11.001.
24. Hale, H. Correlates of clientelism: political economy, politicized ethnicity, and post-communist transition. Patrons, Clients, and Policies. Patterns of Democratic Accounta-bility and Political Competition. Ed. by H. Kitschelt, S. Wilkinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007, pp. 227–250.
25. Hutchcroft, P. D. Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking in the Philippines. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1998, 278 p.
26. Kelsall, T. Rethinking the Relationship between Neopatrimonialism and Economic Development in Africa. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin. 2011, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 76–87, doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00213.x.
27. Kitschelt, H. P. Divergent paths of postcommunist democracies. Political Parties and Democracy. Ed. by L. J. Diamond, G. Richard. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001, pp. 299–323.
28. Lande, C. H. Political clientelism in political studies. Retrospect and prospects. International Political Science Review. 1983, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 440–444.
29. Lemarchand, R., Legg, K. Political Clientelism and Development: A Preliminary Analysis. Comparative Politics. 1972, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 149–178.
30. Loriaux, M. The French Developmental State as Myth and Moral Ambition. The Developmental State. Ed. by M. Woo-Cumings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1999, pp. 235–276.
31. McCaffery, P. When Bosses Ruled Philadelphia: The Emergence of the Republican Machine, 1867–1933. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press; 1993, 264 p.
32. Medard, J. F. Patrimonialism, Patrimonialization, Neo-Patrimonialism and the Study of the Post-Colonial state in Subsaharian Africa. Improved Natural Ressources Management: the Role of Formal Organizations and Informal Networks and Institutions. Ed. by H. S. Marcussen. Occasional Paper, 17. Denmark: Roskilde University; 1996, pp. 76–97.
33. Medard, J.-F. The underdeveloped state in tropical Africa: Political clientelism or neo-patrimonialism? Private Patronage and Public Power: Political Clientelism in the Modern State. Ed. by C. S. Clapham. London: Frances Pinter; 1982, pp. 162–192.
34. Oszlak, O. Public policy and political regimes in Latin America. International Social Science Journal. 1986, no. 38 (2), pp. 219–236.
35. Robinson, N. The Political Origins of Russia’s “Culture Wars”. Limerick: University of Limerick; 2014, 37 p.
36. Robinson, N. Institutional factors and Russian political parties: the changing needs of regime consolidation in a neopatrimonial system. East European Politics. 2012, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 298–309, doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.685629.
37. Roth, G. Personal Rulership, Patrimonialism, and Empire Building in the New States. World Politics. 1968, vol. 20, no 2, pp. 194–206.
38. Scott, J. C. Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review. 1972, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 91–113.
39. Soest, C. von. Neopatrimonialism: a critical assessment. Elgar Handbook on Governance and Development. Ed. by W. Hout, J. Hutchinson. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2022, pp. 145–159, doi: 10.4337/9781789908756.00019.
40. Stokes, S. C. Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review. 2005, vol. 99, no. 03, pp. 315–325, doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051683.
41. Theobald, R. Patrimonialism. World Politics. 1982, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 548–559.
42. Van de Walle, N. The path from neopatrimonialism: democracy and clientelism in Africa today. Cornell University Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies. Working paper. 2007, no. 3-07, 16 p.
43. Weber, M. Economy and Society. An outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press Incorporated; 1968, 1469 p.
44. Zon, H. van. Russia’s Development Problem: The Cult of Power. London: Palgrave; 2008, 206 p.

Popular articles