<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2490</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54398/1818-510X.2025.82.1.014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="udс">14</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>The problem of cogito and the Cartesian subject in the theory of Jacques Lacan</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>The problem of cogito and the Cartesian subject in the theory of Jacques Lacan</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9334-6266</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kazakov</surname><given-names>Daniil K.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kazakov</surname><given-names>Daniil K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>jimmyshelter@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3996" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9843-9983</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Strelnik</surname><given-names>Olga N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Strelnik</surname><given-names>Olga N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ostrelnik@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3997" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff3996"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3997"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-04-21"><day>21</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><fpage>146</fpage><lpage>153</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>11</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></date></history><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2025/issue/1/article/2490">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2025/issue/1/article/2490</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/1(82)/146-153.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/1(82)/146-153.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>This article is devoted to the problem of the subject and the principle of cogito proposed by René Descartes in the context of Jacques Lacan's psychoanalytic theory. The authors analyze how the Cartesian statement “Cogito ergo sum” (“I think, therefore I am”) gave rise to the autonomous and rational “Self”, which changed the philosophical and scientific paradigm until the 20th century. Following Sigmund Freud, the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan proposed a project of revision of Cartesian subjectivity, emphasising the split of the subject in the registers of the Imaginary and the Symbolic. The authors examine how Jacques Lacan arrives at the concept of cogito as “the subject of the unconscious”. The article also deals in detail with the Lacanian concept of the subject's impossible choice between thinking and being by analogy with the expression “Trick or treat!”. It is demonstrated that René Descartes discovers the absolute existence of the subject, and for Jacques Lacan, cogito is what deprives the subject of such existence. The subject of psychoanalysis is the subject of incompleteness, loss and lack. In addition, the work touches upon Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas about the subject and Ludwig Wittgenstein's theory of language. The authors in the work rely on actual research of such representatives of psychoanalytic tradition as Calum Neil, Mladen Dolar, Slavoj Žižek and others. The article outlines the philosophical and socio-political conclusions from the psychoanalytic interpretation of cogito and subject.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article is devoted to the problem of the subject and the principle of cogito proposed by René Descartes in the context of Jacques Lacan's psychoanalytic theory. The authors analyze how the Cartesian statement “Cogito ergo sum” (“I think, therefore I am”) gave rise to the autonomous and rational “Self”, which changed the philosophical and scientific paradigm until the 20th century. Following Sigmund Freud, the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan proposed a project of revision of Cartesian subjectivity, emphasising the split of the subject in the registers of the Imaginary and the Symbolic. The authors examine how Jacques Lacan arrives at the concept of cogito as “the subject of the unconscious”. The article also deals in detail with the Lacanian concept of the subject's impossible choice between thinking and being by analogy with the expression “Trick or treat!”. It is demonstrated that René Descartes discovers the absolute existence of the subject, and for Jacques Lacan, cogito is what deprives the subject of such existence. The subject of psychoanalysis is the subject of incompleteness, loss and lack. In addition, the work touches upon Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas about the subject and Ludwig Wittgenstein's theory of language. The authors in the work rely on actual research of such representatives of psychoanalytic tradition as Calum Neil, Mladen Dolar, Slavoj Žižek and others. The article outlines the philosophical and socio-political conclusions from the psychoanalytic interpretation of cogito and subject.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>cogito</kwd><kwd>subjectivity</kwd><kwd>ego</kwd><kwd>unconscious</kwd><kwd>mirror stage</kwd><kwd>big Other</kwd><kwd>imaginary</kwd><kwd>symbolic</kwd><kwd>language</kwd><kwd>thinking</kwd><kwd>being</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>cogito</kwd><kwd>subjectivity</kwd><kwd>ego</kwd><kwd>unconscious</kwd><kwd>mirror stage</kwd><kwd>big Other</kwd><kwd>imaginary</kwd><kwd>symbolic</kwd><kwd>language</kwd><kwd>thinking</kwd><kwd>being</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list /></back></article>