<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2466</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54398/1818-510X.2024.81.4.012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="udс">32</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>Communication as the basis of legitimacy</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>Communication as the basis of legitimacy</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ignatjeva</surname><given-names>Olga A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ignatjeva</surname><given-names>Olga A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email /><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3964" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff3964"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">St. Petersburg State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">St. Petersburg State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-02-20"><day>20</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>140</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>07</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year></date></history><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2024/issue/4/article/2466">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2024/issue/4/article/2466</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(81)/133-140.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(81)/133-140.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Democratization of society and development of information and communication technologies in the Internet era make it relevant to consider communication aspects as the basis for the legitimacy of modern power. Communication makes possible the political participation of citizens in making a number of political decisions, and the use of digital platforms allows to expand the number of people involved in such processes. The purpose of this article is to conceptualize communication as the basis for the legitimacy of modern power in the information society based on the analysis of the works of representatives of neo- (Julius Habermas) and post-Marxism (M. Castells). The article analyzes the main works of J. Habermas and M. Castells related to the problems of modern power relations, among which it is appropriate to mention “Theory of Communicative Activity”, “Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action”, “Post-National Constellation and the Future of Democracy”, “The Power of Communication”, “The Internet Galaxy”, “The Power of Identity”. The study is theoretical in nature. The work uses a systematic approach that allows for a critical analysis of the concepts of power of the representatives of renewed Marxism, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as a comparative method. An analysis of the works of J. Habermas allows us to assert that communication both within society and between society and power is becoming an important basis for legitimacy in modern conditions. However, this is not only formal codified communication, but also communication both among the population and between the population and officials, which can be legitimized by shared moral standards. M. Castells goes beyond physical interaction, assigning great importance to online communication between society and power. However, it is the network, according to the scientist, that threatens the legitimacy of power in a modern nation state. Modern theoretical sociology and political science brings to the agenda issues of conceptualizing the legitimacy of power in the context of deglobalization at the level of world-renowned scientists.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Democratization of society and development of information and communication technologies in the Internet era make it relevant to consider communication aspects as the basis for the legitimacy of modern power. Communication makes possible the political participation of citizens in making a number of political decisions, and the use of digital platforms allows to expand the number of people involved in such processes. The purpose of this article is to conceptualize communication as the basis for the legitimacy of modern power in the information society based on the analysis of the works of representatives of neo- (Julius Habermas) and post-Marxism (M. Castells). The article analyzes the main works of J. Habermas and M. Castells related to the problems of modern power relations, among which it is appropriate to mention “Theory of Communicative Activity”, “Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action”, “Post-National Constellation and the Future of Democracy”, “The Power of Communication”, “The Internet Galaxy”, “The Power of Identity”. The study is theoretical in nature. The work uses a systematic approach that allows for a critical analysis of the concepts of power of the representatives of renewed Marxism, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as a comparative method. An analysis of the works of J. Habermas allows us to assert that communication both within society and between society and power is becoming an important basis for legitimacy in modern conditions. However, this is not only formal codified communication, but also communication both among the population and between the population and officials, which can be legitimized by shared moral standards. M. Castells goes beyond physical interaction, assigning great importance to online communication between society and power. However, it is the network, according to the scientist, that threatens the legitimacy of power in a modern nation state. Modern theoretical sociology and political science brings to the agenda issues of conceptualizing the legitimacy of power in the context of deglobalization at the level of world-renowned scientists.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>communicative action</kwd><kwd>lifeworld</kwd><kwd>system</kwd><kwd>self</kwd><kwd>intersubjectivity</kwd><kwd>morality</kwd><kwd>network society</kwd><kwd>network state</kwd><kwd>power</kwd><kwd>counterpower</kwd><kwd>legitimacy</kwd><kwd>J. Habermas</kwd><kwd>M. Castells</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>communicative action</kwd><kwd>lifeworld</kwd><kwd>system</kwd><kwd>self</kwd><kwd>intersubjectivity</kwd><kwd>morality</kwd><kwd>network society</kwd><kwd>network state</kwd><kwd>power</kwd><kwd>counterpower</kwd><kwd>legitimacy</kwd><kwd>J. Habermas</kwd><kwd>M. Castells</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list><ref id="ref0"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Castells, М. Vlast kommunikatsii [The Power of Communication]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2020, 591 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Castells, М. Vlast kommunikatsii [The Power of Communication]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2020, 591 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Castells, M. Galaktika Internet [Internet Galaxy]. Ekaterinburg: U-Factoria, Humanitarian University; 2004, 327 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Castells, M. Galaktika Internet [Internet Galaxy]. Ekaterinburg: U-Factoria, Humanitarian University; 2004, 327 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Luhmann, N. Vvedenie v sistemnuyu teoriyu [Introduction to systems theory], Moscow: Logos; 2007, 360 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luhmann, N. Vvedenie v sistemnuyu teoriyu [Introduction to systems theory], Moscow: Logos; 2007, 360 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Foucault, M. Nadzirat i nakazyvat. Rozhdenie tyurmy [To supervise and to punish. The birth of prison]. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 1999, 480 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucault, M. Nadzirat i nakazyvat. Rozhdenie tyurmy [To supervise and to punish. The birth of prison]. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 1999, 480 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas, J. Moralnoe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie [Moral consciousness and communicative action]. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 2000, 379 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas, J. Moralnoe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie [Moral consciousness and communicative action]. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 2000, 379 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas, J. Postnatsionalnaya konstellyatsiya i budushchee demokratii [Post-national constellation and the future of democracy]. Logos. 2003, no. 4–5 (39), pp. 105–152.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas, J. Postnatsionalnaya konstellyatsiya i budushchee demokratii [Post-national constellation and the future of democracy]. Logos. 2003, no. 4–5 (39), pp. 105–152.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas, J. Teoriya kommunikativnoy deyatelnosti [Theory of Communicative Activity]. Moscow: Ves mir; 2022, vol. 2, 878 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas, J. Teoriya kommunikativnoy deyatelnosti [Theory of Communicative Activity]. Moscow: Ves mir; 2022, vol. 2, 878 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Castells, M. The Power of Identity. Edinburgh: Blackwell Publ.; 2010, vol. 2, 538 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Castells, M. The Power of Identity. Edinburgh: Blackwell Publ.; 2010, vol. 2, 538 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Castells, M. The rise of the network society. Edinburgh: Blackwell Publ.; 2010, vol. 1, 597 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Castells, M. The rise of the network society. Edinburgh: Blackwell Publ.; 2010, vol. 1, 597 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Durkheim, E. Sociology and Philosophy. New York: Routledge; 2009, 51 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Durkheim, E. Sociology and Philosophy. New York: Routledge; 2009, 51 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1996, 676 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1996, 676 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas, J. Entgegnungen. A. Honneth, H. Joas. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag; 1986, 521 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas, J. Entgegnungen. A. Honneth, H. Joas. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag; 1986, 521 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas, J. The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000, 338 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas, J. The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000, 338 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McLuhan, M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1962, 294 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McLuhan, M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1962, 294 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mead, G. Mind, self and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 1972, 401 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mead, G. Mind, self and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 1972, 401 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Parsons, T. On the Concept of Political Power. Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society. 1963, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 232–262.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Parsons, T. On the Concept of Political Power. Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society. 1963, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 232–262.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schutz, A. Collected Papers: Studies in Social Theory. Hague: Matinus Nijhoff; 1976, vol. 1, 300 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schutz, A. Collected Papers: Studies in Social Theory. Hague: Matinus Nijhoff; 1976, vol. 1, 300 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Travis, Ch. Uses of Sense: Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Language. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001, 400 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Travis, Ch. Uses of Sense: Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Language. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001, 400 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>