kaspyTHE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture1818-510XАстраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева245510.54398/1818-510X.2024.81.4.00194(470.67)“18/19”Primorsky Dagestan in the Caucasian policy of Russia in the context of the Iranian-Turkish confrontation: from the treaty of Kermanshah to the treaty of Ganja (1732-1735)Primorsky Dagestan in the Caucasian policy of Russia in the context of the Iranian-Turkish confrontation: from the treaty of Kermanshah to the treaty of Ganja (1732-1735)AbdusalamovMagomed-Pasha B.AbdusalamovMagomed-Pasha B.Scientific and Clinical Center named after BashlarovScientific and Clinical Center named after Bashlarov2002202549192008202430092024https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2024/issue/4/article/2455https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(81)/9-19.pdf

The presented scientific publication, based on the documents of the Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire (AWPRI) and special historical literature, examines the Caucasian vector of foreign policy of Russia, Iran and Turkey in a relatively small but fateful chronological segment from the Kermanshah Treaty of 1732 to the Ganja Treaty of 1735. The authors emphasize that the Russian-Iranian and Russian-Ottoman the relations determined the geopolitical situation in the region, in particular in Dagestan. Dominance in the Caucasus region was a priority for each of the contending parties in their eastern policy. It is stated that during the confrontation in the region of the neighboring great powers, the advantage could only be provided to the side that would be able to subdue Primorsky Dagestan. It is emphasized that during the period under study, the policy of the Russian government was cautious and flexible. For the St. Petersburg court, it was of strategic importance to preserve the state of the Iranian-Turkish confrontation and prevent their alliance. This was the only way to ensure the balance of power in the region. The authors conclude that during the uncompromising Ottoman-Iranian confrontation in the region, which negatively affected the socio-economic and political situation, there is a gradual increase in the pro-Russian orientation of local peoples who sought protection from the Russian Empire and saw it as a counterweight to the expansionist aspirations of Iran and Turkey during the period under review.

The presented scientific publication, based on the documents of the Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire (AWPRI) and special historical literature, examines the Caucasian vector of foreign policy of Russia, Iran and Turkey in a relatively small but fateful chronological segment from the Kermanshah Treaty of 1732 to the Ganja Treaty of 1735. The authors emphasize that the Russian-Iranian and Russian-Ottoman the relations determined the geopolitical situation in the region, in particular in Dagestan. Dominance in the Caucasus region was a priority for each of the contending parties in their eastern policy. It is stated that during the confrontation in the region of the neighboring great powers, the advantage could only be provided to the side that would be able to subdue Primorsky Dagestan. It is emphasized that during the period under study, the policy of the Russian government was cautious and flexible. For the St. Petersburg court, it was of strategic importance to preserve the state of the Iranian-Turkish confrontation and prevent their alliance. This was the only way to ensure the balance of power in the region. The authors conclude that during the uncompromising Ottoman-Iranian confrontation in the region, which negatively affected the socio-economic and political situation, there is a gradual increase in the pro-Russian orientation of local peoples who sought protection from the Russian Empire and saw it as a counterweight to the expansionist aspirations of Iran and Turkey during the period under review.

the Russian EmpireCaucasian politicsCaucasian peoplesdagestanturkeyIranCaucasus-Caspian regionnadirthe Kermanshah Treatythe Ganja Treatythe Russian EmpireCaucasian politicsCaucasian peoplesdagestanturkeyIranCaucasus-Caspian regionnadirthe Kermanshah Treatythe Ganja Treaty1. Abdusalamov, M.-P. B. Kumykskie feodalnye vladeniya v politicheskoy zhizni Dagestana v pervoy polovine XVIII veka [Kumyk feudal possessions in the political life of Dagestan in the first half of the XVIII century]. Makhachkala: Peoples of Dagestan; 2008, 192 p.1. Abdusalamov, M.-P. B. Kumykskie feodalnye vladeniya v politicheskoy zhizni Dagestana v pervoy polovine XVIII veka [Kumyk feudal possessions in the political life of Dagestan in the first half of the XVIII century]. Makhachkala: Peoples of Dagestan; 2008, 192 p.2. Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Found 89. Relations between Russia and Turkey, inventory 89/1, 1732, case 8.2. Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Found 89. Relations between Russia and Turkey, inventory 89/1, 1732, case 8.3. Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Found 89. Relations between Russia and Turkey, inventory 89/1, 1733, case 5.3. Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Found 89. Relations between Russia and Turkey, inventory 89/1, 1733, case 5.4. Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Found 89. Relations between Russia and Turkey, inventory 89/1, 1733, case 6.4. Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Found 89. Relations between Russia and Turkey, inventory 89/1, 1733, case 6.5. Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Found 77. Russia's relations with Persia, inventory 1, 1734, case 5.5. Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Found 77. Russia's relations with Persia, inventory 1, 1734, case 5.6. Boguslavsky, L. Istoriya Apsheronskogo polka. 1700–1892 gg. [History of the Absheron regiment. 1700–1892]. St. Petersburg, Tip. Min. of communication routes; 1892, vol. 1, 518 p.6. Boguslavsky, L. Istoriya Apsheronskogo polka. 1700–1892 gg. [History of the Absheron regiment. 1700–1892]. St. Petersburg, Tip. Min. of communication routes; 1892, vol. 1, 518 p.7. Gadzhiev, V. G. Razgrom Nadir-shaha v Dagestane [The defeat of Nadir Shah in Dagestan]. Makhachkala: Mininformpechat, 1996, 260 p.7. Gadzhiev, V. G. Razgrom Nadir-shaha v Dagestane [The defeat of Nadir Shah in Dagestan]. Makhachkala: Mininformpechat, 1996, 260 p.8. Ivanov, M. S. Ocherk istorii Irana [An essay on the history of Iran]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1952, 467 p.8. Ivanov, M. S. Ocherk istorii Irana [An essay on the history of Iran]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1952, 467 p.9. Istoriya Turetskogo gosudarstva ot samogo osnovaniya onogo do noveyshikh vremen [The history of the Turkish state from the very foundation of it to modern times]. Moscow: Universitatskaya tipografiya; 1828, vol. 2, 91 p.9. Istoriya Turetskogo gosudarstva ot samogo osnovaniya onogo do noveyshikh vremen [The history of the Turkish state from the very foundation of it to modern times]. Moscow: Universitatskaya tipografiya; 1828, vol. 2, 91 p.10. Kavkazsko-Kaspiyskiy region v politike Rossiyskoy imperii v pervoy treti XVIII v. [The Caucasian-Caspian region in the politics of the Russian Empire in the first third of the XVIII century]. Makhachkala: Lotos; 2022, 304 p.10. Kavkazsko-Kaspiyskiy region v politike Rossiyskoy imperii v pervoy treti XVIII v. [The Caucasian-Caspian region in the politics of the Russian Empire in the first third of the XVIII century]. Makhachkala: Lotos; 2022, 304 p.11. Klostr, A. Istoriya o persidskom shakhe Takhmas Kuly-khane [The story of the Persian Shah Tahmasz Kuli Khan]. St. Petersburg: [Dependent and type of P. Bogdanovich]; 1790, 260 p.11. Klostr, A. Istoriya o persidskom shakhe Takhmas Kuly-khane [The story of the Persian Shah Tahmasz Kuli Khan]. St. Petersburg: [Dependent and type of P. Bogdanovich]; 1790, 260 p.12. Magomedov, R. M. Dargintsy v dagestanskom istoricheskom protsesse [Dargins in the Dagestan historical process]. Makhachkala: Dagknigoizdat; 1999, book 2, 520 p.12. Magomedov, R. M. Dargintsy v dagestanskom istoricheskom protsesse [Dargins in the Dagestan historical process]. Makhachkala: Dagknigoizdat; 1999, book 2, 520 p.13. Neverovsky, A. A. Kratkiy istoricheskiy vzglyad na Severnyy i Sredniy Dagestan do unichtozheniya vliyaniya lezginov na Zakavkaz'e [A brief historical look at Northern and Middle Dagestan before the destruction of the influence of the Lezgins in Transcaucasia]. St. Petersburg: Typografy military-studies the institution; 1848, 42 p.13. Neverovsky, A. A. Kratkiy istoricheskiy vzglyad na Severnyy i Sredniy Dagestan do unichtozheniya vliyaniya lezginov na Zakavkaz'e [A brief historical look at Northern and Middle Dagestan before the destruction of the influence of the Lezgins in Transcaucasia]. St. Petersburg: Typografy military-studies the institution; 1848, 42 p.14. Russko-dagestanskie otnosheniya v XVIII – nachale XIX v. [Russian-Dagestan relations in the XVIII – early XIX centuries: collection of documents]. Compiled V. G. Gadzhiev, D.-M. S. Gabiev, N. A. Magomedov [et al.]. Moscow: Nauka; 1988, 357 p.14. Russko-dagestanskie otnosheniya v XVIII – nachale XIX v. [Russian-Dagestan relations in the XVIII – early XIX centuries: collection of documents]. Compiled V. G. Gadzhiev, D.-M. S. Gabiev, N. A. Magomedov [et al.]. Moscow: Nauka; 1988, 357 p.15. Sotavov, M. N. Krymskoe khanstvo v russko-tureckih otnosheniyah v XVIII v. (1700–1783) v svete vliyaniya ih na Dagestan [The Crimean Khanate in Russian-Turkish relations in the XVIII century (1700–1783) in the light of their influence on Dagestan]. Makhachkala: Dagestan State University; 2010, 168 p.15. Sotavov, M. N. Krymskoe khanstvo v russko-tureckih otnosheniyah v XVIII v. (1700–1783) v svete vliyaniya ih na Dagestan [The Crimean Khanate in Russian-Turkish relations in the XVIII century (1700–1783) in the light of their influence on Dagestan]. Makhachkala: Dagestan State University; 2010, 168 p.16. Sotavov, M. N., Abdusalamov, M.-P. B. Dagestan v period nashestviy kalgi Fetkhi-Gireya i khana Kaplan-Gireya (1732–1735 gg.) [Dagestan during the invasions of Kalgi Fethi Giray and Khan Kaplan Giray (1732–1735)]. Derbent v istoricheskom protsesse Kavkaza i Rossii [Derbent in the historical process of the Caucasus and Russia]. Makhachkala: Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science IIAE Dagestan Scientific Center of the RAS; 2015, pp. 326–336.16. Sotavov, M. N., Abdusalamov, M.-P. B. Dagestan v period nashestviy kalgi Fetkhi-Gireya i khana Kaplan-Gireya (1732–1735 gg.) [Dagestan during the invasions of Kalgi Fethi Giray and Khan Kaplan Giray (1732–1735)]. Derbent v istoricheskom protsesse Kavkaza i Rossii [Derbent in the historical process of the Caucasus and Russia]. Makhachkala: Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science IIAE Dagestan Scientific Center of the RAS; 2015, pp. 326–336.17. Sotavov, N.-P. A. Krakh “Grozy Vselennoy” v Dagestane [The collapse of the “Thunderstorm of the Universe” in Dagestan]. Makhachkala: Epokha; 2013, 304 p.17. Sotavov, N.-P. A. Krakh “Grozy Vselennoy” v Dagestane [The collapse of the “Thunderstorm of the Universe” in Dagestan]. Makhachkala: Epokha; 2013, 304 p.18. Cassels, L. The Struggle for the Ottoman Empire, 1717–1740. London: John Murray; 1966, 226 p.18. Cassels, L. The Struggle for the Ottoman Empire, 1717–1740. London: John Murray; 1966, 226 p.19. Ramasany, R. K. The Foreign Policy of Iran. A Developing nation in world affairs: 1500–1941. Charlottesville: Univ. press of Virginia; 1966, 330 p.19. Ramasany, R. K. The Foreign Policy of Iran. A Developing nation in world affairs: 1500–1941. Charlottesville: Univ. press of Virginia; 1966, 330 p.20. Hammer, J. Geschichte des osmanischen Reiches: größtentheils aus bisher unbenützten Handschriften und Archiven. Bd. 7: Vom Carlowiczer bis zum Belgrader Frieden, 1699 – 1739. Pest: Hartleben; 1831, 630 р.20. Hammer, J. Geschichte des osmanischen Reiches: größtentheils aus bisher unbenützten Handschriften und Archiven. Bd. 7: Vom Carlowiczer bis zum Belgrader Frieden, 1699 – 1739. Pest: Hartleben; 1831, 630 р.