<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2332</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54398/1818510X_2024_1_191</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="udс">130.2</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>History of the formation of the concept of abstract art: philosophical context</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>History of the formation of the concept of abstract art: philosophical context</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0218-5902</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Satsukevich</surname><given-names>Anna I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Satsukevich</surname><given-names>Anna I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>AU10029@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3776" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff3776"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" /><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-10-15"><day>15</day><month>10</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><fpage>191</fpage><lpage>198</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></date></history><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2024/issue/1/article/2332">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2024/issue/1/article/2332</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/1(78)/191-198.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/1(78)/191-198.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The purpose of this article is to study the history of the formation of the concept of abstract art and to identify its characteristic features. The author proceeds from the idea that abstractism is not only a trend in art, but also a form of modern thinking. The practical significance of abstractionism here is expressed in an address to the person, namely in his translation to the world. The study attempts to identify the differences between ordinary forms of thinking and narrative forms of thinking. In the historical-chronological section, the forms of identification and comparison of irrelevant art will be closely related to the historical movement of philosophical, socio-political thought Modern art is largely based on the phenomena of transmedia and multimedia, where the impact of abstraction can be traced to a wide variety of cultural activities, from architecture and building lighting to advertising, from cinema to poetry. As a result, the author concludes that abstract art continues its development in modern times and requires an anthropological and deconstructive approach. Since, in our view, the abstract exposes the mechanisms of interpretation and work of consciousness, a large-scale multidisciplinary study of modern abstract art can lead to interesting conclusions</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of this article is to study the history of the formation of the concept of abstract art and to identify its characteristic features. The author proceeds from the idea that abstractism is not only a trend in art, but also a form of modern thinking. The practical significance of abstractionism here is expressed in an address to the person, namely in his translation to the world. The study attempts to identify the differences between ordinary forms of thinking and narrative forms of thinking. In the historical-chronological section, the forms of identification and comparison of irrelevant art will be closely related to the historical movement of philosophical, socio-political thought Modern art is largely based on the phenomena of transmedia and multimedia, where the impact of abstraction can be traced to a wide variety of cultural activities, from architecture and building lighting to advertising, from cinema to poetry. As a result, the author concludes that abstract art continues its development in modern times and requires an anthropological and deconstructive approach. Since, in our view, the abstract exposes the mechanisms of interpretation and work of consciousness, a large-scale multidisciplinary study of modern abstract art can lead to interesting conclusions</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>abstractionism</kwd><kwd>modern art</kwd><kwd>consciousness</kwd><kwd>thinking</kwd><kwd>forms of thought</kwd><kwd>mythological</kwd><kwd>narrative</kwd><kwd>non-objective art</kwd><kwd>philosophical anthropology</kwd><kwd>historical discourse</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>abstractionism</kwd><kwd>modern art</kwd><kwd>consciousness</kwd><kwd>thinking</kwd><kwd>forms of thought</kwd><kwd>mythological</kwd><kwd>narrative</kwd><kwd>non-objective art</kwd><kwd>philosophical anthropology</kwd><kwd>historical discourse</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list><ref id="ref0"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Avtonomova, N. S. Claude Levi-Strauss – in memoriam: uroki strukturnoy antropologii i gumanizm XXI veka [Claude Levi-Strauss – in memoriam: lessons of structural anthropology and humanism of the 21st century]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. 2010, no. 8, pp. 97–108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Avtonomova, N. S. Claude Levi-Strauss – in memoriam: uroki strukturnoy antropologii i gumanizm XXI veka [Claude Levi-Strauss – in memoriam: lessons of structural anthropology and humanism of the 21st century]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. 2010, no. 8, pp. 97–108.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gegel, G. V. F. Kto myslit abstraktno? [Who thinks abstractly?]. Raboty raznykh let [Works of different years]. Moscow: Mysl; 1970, pp. 387–395.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gegel, G. V. F. Kto myslit abstraktno? [Who thinks abstractly?]. Raboty raznykh let [Works of different years]. Moscow: Mysl; 1970, pp. 387–395.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Girenok, F. I. Klipovoe soznanie [Clip consciousness]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2016, 256 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Girenok, F. I. Klipovoe soznanie [Clip consciousness]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2016, 256 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gusserl, Е. Idei k chistoy fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoy filosofii. Kniga pervaya. Obshchee vvedenie v chistuyu fenomenologiyu [Ideas towards pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. Volume one. General introduction to pure phenomenology]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt; 2015, 489 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gusserl, Е. Idei k chistoy fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoy filosofii. Kniga pervaya. Obshchee vvedenie v chistuyu fenomenologiyu [Ideas towards pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. Volume one. General introduction to pure phenomenology]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt; 2015, 489 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dagldiyan, K. T. Abstraktnaya kompozitsiya: osnovy teorii i prakticheskie metody tvorchestva v abstraktnoy zhivopisi i skulpture [Abstract composition: basic theory and practical methods of creativity in abstract painting and sculpture]. Moscow: Vlados; 2018, 208 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dagldiyan, K. T. Abstraktnaya kompozitsiya: osnovy teorii i prakticheskie metody tvorchestva v abstraktnoy zhivopisi i skulpture [Abstract composition: basic theory and practical methods of creativity in abstract painting and sculpture]. Moscow: Vlados; 2018, 208 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sokhareva, T. Vizualnaya poeziya na perekrestke traditsiy [Visual poetry at the crossroads of traditions]. Dialog iskusstv [Dialogue of Arts]. 2023, no. 1, pp. 58–64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokhareva, T. Vizualnaya poeziya na perekrestke traditsiy [Visual poetry at the crossroads of traditions]. Dialog iskusstv [Dialogue of Arts]. 2023, no. 1, pp. 58–64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dubovskiy, Yu. A., Zagraevskaya, T. B., Zagraevskaya, S. M. Abstraktnoe v myshlenii: interpretatsiya kontseptsii G. V. F. Gegelya [Abstract in thinking: interpretation of the concept of G. W. F. Hegel]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Bulletin]. 2022, no. 476, pp. 84–94. doi: 10.17223/15617793/476/9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dubovskiy, Yu. A., Zagraevskaya, T. B., Zagraevskaya, S. M. Abstraktnoe v myshlenii: interpretatsiya kontseptsii G. V. F. Gegelya [Abstract in thinking: interpretation of the concept of G. W. F. Hegel]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Bulletin]. 2022, no. 476, pp. 84–94. doi: 10.17223/15617793/476/9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zinovev, A. A. Voshozhdenie ot abstraktnogo k konkretnomu (Na materiale “Kapitala”
K. Marksa) [Ascent from the abstract to the concrete (Based on the material of “Capital” by K. Marx)]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy RAS; 2002, 319 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zinovev, A. A. Voshozhdenie ot abstraktnogo k konkretnomu (Na materiale “Kapitala”
K. Marksa) [Ascent from the abstract to the concrete (Based on the material of “Capital” by K. Marx)]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy RAS; 2002, 319 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ilenkov, Ye. V. Dialektika abstraktnogo i konkretnogo v nauchno-teoreticheskom myshlenii [Dialectics of abstract and concrete in scientific and theoretical thinking]. Moscow: Rosspen; 1997, 464 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ilenkov, Ye. V. Dialektika abstraktnogo i konkretnogo v nauchno-teoreticheskom myshlenii [Dialectics of abstract and concrete in scientific and theoretical thinking]. Moscow: Rosspen; 1997, 464 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kozhev, A. Konkretnaya (obektivnaya) zhivopis Kandinskogo (1936) [Concrete (objective) painting by Kandinsky (1936)]. “Ateizm” i drugie raboty [“Atheism” and other works]. Moscow: Praksis; 2007, pp. 258–294.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kozhev, A. Konkretnaya (obektivnaya) zhivopis Kandinskogo (1936) [Concrete (objective) painting by Kandinsky (1936)]. “Ateizm” i drugie raboty [“Atheism” and other works]. Moscow: Praksis; 2007, pp. 258–294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levi-Stross, K. Po povodu posmertnoy vystavki proizvedeniy odnogo khudozhnika [Regarding the posthumous exhibition of works by one artist]. Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural anthropology]. Moscow: Praksis; 1980, 399 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levi-Stross, K. Po povodu posmertnoy vystavki proizvedeniy odnogo khudozhnika [Regarding the posthumous exhibition of works by one artist]. Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural anthropology]. Moscow: Praksis; 1980, 399 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mozhnyagun, S. E. O modernizme. Etyud vtoroy. Fenomen bespredmetnichestva [About modernism. The second sketch. The phenomenon of non-objectivity]. Moscow: Iskusstvo; 1974, 240 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mozhnyagun, S. E. O modernizme. Etyud vtoroy. Fenomen bespredmetnichestva [About modernism. The second sketch. The phenomenon of non-objectivity]. Moscow: Iskusstvo; 1974, 240 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shevchenko, N. I. Novyy avangard XXI veka: vykhod iz zastoya postmodernizma i shkola nauchnogo konkretnogo iskusstvovedeniya [The new avant-garde of the 21st century: a way out of the stagnation of postmodernism and a school of scientific concrete art criticism].; Belgorod State Technological University; 2016, 256 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shevchenko, N. I. Novyy avangard XXI veka: vykhod iz zastoya postmodernizma i shkola nauchnogo konkretnogo iskusstvovedeniya [The new avant-garde of the 21st century: a way out of the stagnation of postmodernism and a school of scientific concrete art criticism].; Belgorod State Technological University; 2016, 256 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stoykov, A. Kritika abstraktnogo iskusstva i ego teoriy [Criticism of abstract art and its theories]. Moscow: Iskusstvo; 1964, 248 p. </mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stoykov, A. Kritika abstraktnogo iskusstva i ego teoriy [Criticism of abstract art and its theories]. Moscow: Iskusstvo; 1964, 248 p. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Frolov I. T. Filosofskiy slovar [Philosophical Dictionary]. Moscow: Politicheskaya literatura; 1987, 590 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frolov I. T. Filosofskiy slovar [Philosophical Dictionary]. Moscow: Politicheskaya literatura; 1987, 590 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>