<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2311</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54398/1818510Х_2023_4_196</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="udс">82-1</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>Reception of the anthropological principle of Dostoevsky’s duality in the works of L. Andreev and J. Fosse</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>Reception of the anthropological principle of Dostoevsky’s duality in the works of L. Andreev and J. Fosse</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7336-0230</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kholodnova</surname><given-names>Ksenia N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kholodnova</surname><given-names>Ksenia N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>kholodnovaksenia@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3745" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff3745"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" /><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-02-13"><day>13</day><month>02</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>196</fpage><lpage>205</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>08</month><year>2023</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></date></history><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2023/issue/4/article/2311">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2023/issue/4/article/2311</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(77)/196-205.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(77)/196-205.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>It is difficult to overestimate the relevance of understanding the manifestation of the duality of human nature. For many centuries, starting with Plato, philosophers and thinkers have sought to understand what this phenomenon of human nature is and what consequences it leads to. One of such philosophers and thinkers was the Russian writer F. M. Dostoevsky, who conceptualized duality as a split self and postulated it as a fundamental anthropological principle. The article analyzes the content of the concept of human duality, which is understood by F.M. Dostoevsky is most complete in the type of "underground man", and the reception of the ideas of F.M. Dostoevsky in the works of the Russian writer L. N. Andreev and the Norwegian playwright J. Fosse. For the first time, duality in the work "Judas Iscariot" is understood as subjectivity, which seeks to subdue reality, overcoming the meaninglessness of reality, and also the origins of the bifurcation of the hero of the novel J. Fosse In the philosophy of F.M. Dostoevsky, L. Andreev creates Judas Iscariot, who belongs to subjectivity and lives not among what exists, but among what is given. And J. Fosse creates an image of a person who resists the world of the present, lives in dreams, dreams, visions and gradually moves towards a radical reduction of existence. Attempts to ask about a person in an anti-project and anti-doctrinal way create an opportunity to overcome the elimination of a person from philosophical discourse. The main research methods are comparative, textual and anthropological analysis of the concepts of selected thinkers. A conscious advantage is given to the anthropological method, as such, which helps to achieve the purpose of this article.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>It is difficult to overestimate the relevance of understanding the manifestation of the duality of human nature. For many centuries, starting with Plato, philosophers and thinkers have sought to understand what this phenomenon of human nature is and what consequences it leads to. One of such philosophers and thinkers was the Russian writer F. M. Dostoevsky, who conceptualized duality as a split self and postulated it as a fundamental anthropological principle. The article analyzes the content of the concept of human duality, which is understood by F.M. Dostoevsky is most complete in the type of "underground man", and the reception of the ideas of F.M. Dostoevsky in the works of the Russian writer L. N. Andreev and the Norwegian playwright J. Fosse. For the first time, duality in the work "Judas Iscariot" is understood as subjectivity, which seeks to subdue reality, overcoming the meaninglessness of reality, and also the origins of the bifurcation of the hero of the novel J. Fosse In the philosophy of F.M. Dostoevsky, L. Andreev creates Judas Iscariot, who belongs to subjectivity and lives not among what exists, but among what is given. And J. Fosse creates an image of a person who resists the world of the present, lives in dreams, dreams, visions and gradually moves towards a radical reduction of existence. Attempts to ask about a person in an anti-project and anti-doctrinal way create an opportunity to overcome the elimination of a person from philosophical discourse. The main research methods are comparative, textual and anthropological analysis of the concepts of selected thinkers. A conscious advantage is given to the anthropological method, as such, which helps to achieve the purpose of this article.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Dostoevsky</kwd><kwd>the anthropological principle of duality</kwd><kwd>Russian philosophy</kwd><kwd> man</kwd><kwd> Andreev</kwd><kwd>Fosse</kwd><kwd>the crisis of the subject</kwd><kwd>subjectivity</kwd><kwd>subject</kwd><kwd>double</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Dostoevsky</kwd><kwd>the anthropological principle of duality</kwd><kwd>Russian philosophy</kwd><kwd> man</kwd><kwd> Andreev</kwd><kwd>Fosse</kwd><kwd>the crisis of the subject</kwd><kwd>subjectivity</kwd><kwd>subject</kwd><kwd>double</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list><ref id="ref0"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Andreev, L. N. Iuda Iskariot [Judas Iscariot]. Moscow: AST; 2021, 416 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Andreev, L. N. Iuda Iskariot [Judas Iscariot]. Moscow: AST; 2021, 416 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Girenok, F. I. Vvedenie v singulyarnuyu filosofiyu [Introduction to singular philosophy]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2022, 304 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Girenok, F. I. Vvedenie v singulyarnuyu filosofiyu [Introduction to singular philosophy]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2022, 304 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Girenok, F. I. Krizis subekta [The crisis of the subject]. Literaturnaja gazeta [The Literary Newspaper]. 2015, September 2, no. 34 (6522), p. 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Girenok, F. I. Krizis subekta [The crisis of the subject]. Literaturnaja gazeta [The Literary Newspaper]. 2015, September 2, no. 34 (6522), p. 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grossman, L. P. Borba za stil. Opyty po kritike i poetike [The struggle for style. Experiments on criticism and poetics]. Moscow: Nikitinskie subboty; 1927, 337 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grossman, L. P. Borba za stil. Opyty po kritike i poetike [The struggle for style. Experiments on criticism and poetics]. Moscow: Nikitinskie subboty; 1927, 337 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Bratya Karamazovy [The Brothers Karamazov]. Moscow: Eksmo; 2020, 896 p. (Biblioteka vsemirnoy literatury).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Bratya Karamazovy [The Brothers Karamazov]. Moscow: Eksmo; 2020, 896 p. (Biblioteka vsemirnoy literatury).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Dvoynik [The Double]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus; 2020, pp. 121–270.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Dvoynik [The Double]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus; 2020, pp. 121–270.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Dnevnik pisatelya [The Writer’s diary]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus; 2021, 1056 p. (Russkaya literatura. Bolshie knigi).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Dnevnik pisatelya [The Writer’s diary]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus; 2021, 1056 p. (Russkaya literatura. Bolshie knigi).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Zapiski iz podpolya [Notes from the underground]. Moscow: ALFA-KNIGA; 2019, pp. 596–674.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Zapiski iz podpolya [Notes from the underground]. Moscow: ALFA-KNIGA; 2019, pp. 596–674.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Pisma 1872–1881 [The letters 1872–1881]. Moscow: T8RUGRAM; 2018, 266 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dostoevskiy, F. M. Pisma 1872–1881 [The letters 1872–1881]. Moscow: T8RUGRAM; 2018, 266 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Intervyu s norvezhskim prozaikom i dramaturgom Yunom Fosse [interview with Norwegian novelist and playwright Jun Fosse]. Available at: https://gorky.media/context/vdnf-menya-pisat-eto-sposob-zhit/ (accessed: 10.06.2023).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Intervyu s norvezhskim prozaikom i dramaturgom Yunom Fosse [interview with Norwegian novelist and playwright Jun Fosse]. Available at: https://gorky.media/context/vdnf-menya-pisat-eto-sposob-zhit/ (accessed: 10.06.2023).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prepodobnyy Iustin (Popovich). Filosofiya i religiya F. M. Dostoevskogo [Dostoevsky’s philosophy and religion]. Minsk: Publ. House of Dmitriy Kharchenko; 2014, 439 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prepodobnyy Iustin (Popovich). Filosofiya i religiya F. M. Dostoevskogo [Dostoevsky’s philosophy and religion]. Minsk: Publ. House of Dmitriy Kharchenko; 2014, 439 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fosse, Yun. Drugoe imya. Septologiya I–II [The Other Name: Septology I–II]. Translated. of N. Fedorova. Moscow: Eksmo; 2022, 352 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fosse, Yun. Drugoe imya. Septologiya I–II [The Other Name: Septology I–II]. Translated. of N. Fedorova. Moscow: Eksmo; 2022, 352 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baudrillard, J. Why hasn’t everything already disappeared? Calcutta: Seagull books; 2009, 77 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baudrillard, J. Why hasn’t everything already disappeared? Calcutta: Seagull books; 2009, 77 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>