kaspyTHE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture1818-510XАстраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева222010.54398/1818510X_2022_4_155330Evaluation of the economic efficiency of the investment project "Agrobot"Evaluation of the economic efficiency of the investment project "Agrobot"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-0913RybakovAlexey V.RybakovAlexey V.rybakov_alex@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4223-6391RybakovIlya A.RybakovIlya A.ilya_rybakov_99@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9959-8716ArykbayevRavil K.ArykbayevRavil K.ravilarykbaev@mail.ruAstrakhan State University named after V. N. TatishchevAstrakhan State University named after V. N. TatishchevAstrakhan State University named after V. N. TatishchevAstrakhan State University named after V. N. TatishchevAstrakhan State Technical UniversityAstrakhan State Technical University1303202341551591705202230092022https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2022/issue/4/article/2220https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(73)/155-159.pdf

The paper presents an analysis of existing publications in the field of economic efficiency of agricultural robotics, provides methods used in our country to assess the economic efficiency of investment projects and calculations of the project "Agrobot" according to the selected methods. The investment project is focused on application in the agricultural sector. The target audience of the project at the first stage is farms of the Astrakhan region and large agricultural producers of the region. It is assumed that a small enterprise will be created to sell agricultural robots. The main products sold within the framework of the Agrobot project will be robotic complexes of 3 modifications: lightweight, basic and improved. To present the Agrobot project to investors, it is necessary to calculate its economic efficiency. The economic efficiency of the investment project is calculated by the method of net discounted income using various approaches to determining the value of the risk premium. The calculation was made for 4 years with a preliminary one-time investment of the order of the cost of 60 robots and payment for the work of the project performers. The project under consideration, taking into account the stated prices and the sales plan, will begin to make a profit after 4 years and can be invested for the declared amount.

The paper presents an analysis of existing publications in the field of economic efficiency of agricultural robotics, provides methods used in our country to assess the economic efficiency of investment projects and calculations of the project "Agrobot" according to the selected methods. The investment project is focused on application in the agricultural sector. The target audience of the project at the first stage is farms of the Astrakhan region and large agricultural producers of the region. It is assumed that a small enterprise will be created to sell agricultural robots. The main products sold within the framework of the Agrobot project will be robotic complexes of 3 modifications: lightweight, basic and improved. To present the Agrobot project to investors, it is necessary to calculate its economic efficiency. The economic efficiency of the investment project is calculated by the method of net discounted income using various approaches to determining the value of the risk premium. The calculation was made for 4 years with a preliminary one-time investment of the order of the cost of 60 robots and payment for the work of the project performers. The project under consideration, taking into account the stated prices and the sales plan, will begin to make a profit after 4 years and can be invested for the declared amount.

agricultureroboticsharvestingdigital technologiesdigital agriculture economicsrobotic systemseconomic efficiencyautomationresearchcomputer visionagricultureroboticsharvestingdigital technologiesdigital agriculture economicsrobotic systemseconomic efficiencyautomationresearchcomputer visionArykbayev, R. K., Rybakov, A. V., Starov, D. V., Mikhailov, I. V., Vildanov E. M. Ekonomicheskie aspekty primeneniya robototekhniki v selskom khozyaystve [Economic aspects of robotics application in agriculture]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo [Economics and entrepreneurship]. 2021, iss. 3 (128), pp. 1240–1247. doi: 10.34925/EIP.2021.128.3.249.Arykbayev, R. K., Rybakov, A. V., Starov, D. V., Mikhailov, I. V., Vildanov E. M. Ekonomicheskie aspekty primeneniya robototekhniki v selskom khozyaystve [Economic aspects of robotics application in agriculture]. Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo [Economics and entrepreneurship]. 2021, iss. 3 (128), pp. 1240–1247. doi: 10.34925/EIP.2021.128.3.249. Bezriskovaya stavka [Risk-free rate]. Available at: https://conomy.ru / (accessed: 10.02.2022). Bezriskovaya stavka [Risk-free rate]. Available at: https://conomy.ru / (accessed: 10.02.2022).Vedomstvennyy proekt “Tsifrovoe selskoe khozyaystvo”: ofitsialnoe izdanie [Departmental project "Digital Agriculture": official publication]. Moscow: Rosinformagrotekh; 2019, 48 p.Vedomstvennyy proekt “Tsifrovoe selskoe khozyaystvo”: ofitsialnoe izdanie [Departmental project "Digital Agriculture": official publication]. Moscow: Rosinformagrotekh; 2019, 48 p.Godovaya inflyatsiya v RF v avguste vyrosla do 6,68 % [Annual inflation in the Russian Federation in August rose to 6.68 %]. Available at: https://www.interfax.ru/russia/789203 (accessed: 13.02.2022).Godovaya inflyatsiya v RF v avguste vyrosla do 6,68 % [Annual inflation in the Russian Federation in August rose to 6.68 %]. Available at: https://www.interfax.ru/russia/789203 (accessed: 13.02.2022).Gilemkhanov R. A., Braila N. V. Metody otsenki finansovo-ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti investitsionno-stroitelnykh proektov [Methods of assessing the financial and economic efficiency of investment and construction projects]. Stroitelstvo unikalnykh zdaniy i sooruzheniy [Construction of unique buildings and structures]. 2016, no. 10 (49), pp. 7–19. doi: 10.18720/CUBS.49.1.Gilemkhanov R. A., Braila N. V. Metody otsenki finansovo-ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti investitsionno-stroitelnykh proektov [Methods of assessing the financial and economic efficiency of investment and construction projects]. Stroitelstvo unikalnykh zdaniy i sooruzheniy [Construction of unique buildings and structures]. 2016, no. 10 (49), pp. 7–19. doi: 10.18720/CUBS.49.1.Kasatov A. D. Razvitie ekonomicheskikh metodov upravleniya integrirovannymi korporativnymi strukturami v promyshlennosti: investitsionnyy aspekt [Development of economic methods of management of integrated corporate structures in industry: investment aspect]. Moscow: Ekonomicheskaya gazeta; 2010, 324 p.Kasatov A. D. Razvitie ekonomicheskikh metodov upravleniya integrirovannymi korporativnymi strukturami v promyshlennosti: investitsionnyy aspekt [Development of economic methods of management of integrated corporate structures in industry: investment aspect]. Moscow: Ekonomicheskaya gazeta; 2010, 324 p.Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov [Methodological recommendations for evaluating the effectiveness of investment projects.]. 2 nd ed. Official publication Moscow: Ekonomika; 2000, 421 p.Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov [Methodological recommendations for evaluating the effectiveness of investment projects.]. 2 nd ed. Official publication Moscow: Ekonomika; 2000, 421 p.Edan, Yu., Benadi, M., Miles, G. E. Economic analysis of robotic melon harvesting. St. Joseph, Michigan, USA: ASAE; 1992, pp. 92–1512,Edan, Yu., Benadi, M., Miles, G. E. Economic analysis of robotic melon harvesting. St. Joseph, Michigan, USA: ASAE; 1992, pp. 92–1512, Gauss, K. S., Urso, L. M., Minsen, T. F., de Witte, T. Economics of mechanical weeding by a swarm of small field robots. 57th Annual Conference. Brunswick, Germany: German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), 2017, pp. 1–4. Gauss, K. S., Urso, L. M., Minsen, T. F., de Witte, T. Economics of mechanical weeding by a swarm of small field robots. 57th Annual Conference. Brunswick, Germany: German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), 2017, pp. 1–4.McCorkle, D. A., Dudensing, R. M., Hanselka, D., Hellman E. V. Economics of robotic technologies in grape production in Texas. San Antonio, USA: Southern Agricultural Economics Association. SAEA Annual Meeting; 2016, pp. 1–22.McCorkle, D. A., Dudensing, R. M., Hanselka, D., Hellman E. V. Economics of robotic technologies in grape production in Texas. San Antonio, USA: Southern Agricultural Economics Association. SAEA Annual Meeting; 2016, pp. 1–22.Pedersen, S. M., Fauntas, S., Khav, H., Blackmore, B. S. Agricultural Robots – System Analysis and Economic Feasibility. Precision Agriculture. 2006, no. 7 (4), pp. 295–308. doi: 10.1007/s11119-006-9014-9.Pedersen, S. M., Fauntas, S., Khav, H., Blackmore, B. S. Agricultural Robots – System Analysis and Economic Feasibility. Precision Agriculture. 2006, no. 7 (4), pp. 295–308. doi: 10.1007/s11119-006-9014-9.Pedersen, S. M., Fauntas, S., Blackmore, S. Agricultural robots – application and economic prospects. Applications for service robots. Ed. by Y. Takahashi. Rijeka: Intech; 2006, pp. 369–382.Pedersen, S. M., Fauntas, S., Blackmore, S. Agricultural robots – application and economic prospects. Applications for service robots. Ed. by Y. Takahashi. Rijeka: Intech; 2006, pp. 369–382.Pedersen, S. M., Fauntas, S., Sorensen, K. G., Van Evert, F. K., Blackmore B. S. Robotic sowing: economic prospects. Precision agriculture: Technological and Economic Perspectives. Ed. by S. M. Pedersen and K. M. Lind. Cham: Springer International Publ., 2017, pp. 167–179. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68715-5_8.Pedersen, S. M., Fauntas, S., Sorensen, K. G., Van Evert, F. K., Blackmore B. S. Robotic sowing: economic prospects. Precision agriculture: Technological and Economic Perspectives. Ed. by S. M. Pedersen and K. M. Lind. Cham: Springer International Publ., 2017, pp. 167–179. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68715-5_8.Sorensen, K. G., Madsen, N. A., Jacobsen, B. H. Scenarios of organic farming: operational analysis and costs for the introduction of innovative technologies. Development of biosystems. 2005, vol. 91 (2), pp. 127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.03.006.Sorensen, K. G., Madsen, N. A., Jacobsen, B. H. Scenarios of organic farming: operational analysis and costs for the introduction of innovative technologies. Development of biosystems. 2005, vol. 91 (2), pp. 127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.03.006.Shockley, J. M., Dillon, D. Assessment of the economic feasibility of the introduction of autonomous field equipment in the production of row crops. 14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture. Retrieved October 30, 2018. Montreal, Canada: 2018. Available at: https://www.ispag.org/proceedings/?action=download&item=4749.Shockley, J. M., Dillon, D. Assessment of the economic feasibility of the introduction of autonomous field equipment in the production of row crops. 14th International Conference on Precision Agriculture. Retrieved October 30, 2018. Montreal, Canada: 2018. Available at: https://www.ispag.org/proceedings/?action=download&item=4749.