<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2218</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54398/1818510X_2022_4_146</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="udс">128</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>The editing principle of thinking as the basis of author's innovations in the art of cinema in the context of philosophical and anthropological problems</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>The editing principle of thinking as the basis of author's innovations in the art of cinema in the context of philosophical and anthropological problems</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8564-6702</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Panova</surname><given-names>Stella V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Panova</surname><given-names>Stella V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>stella.panova@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3613" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff3613"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Chelyabinsk State Institute of Culture</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Chelyabinsk State Institute of Culture</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" /><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-03-13"><day>13</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>146</fpage><lpage>150</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>05</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></date></history><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2022/issue/4/article/2218">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2022/issue/4/article/2218</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(73)/146-150.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(73)/146-150.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article offers a philosophical interpretation of theoretical concepts devoted to the editing principle of thinking a phenomenon in cinematography, which is based on the creation of a new quality that arises with a purposeful author's combination of frames. The value of the contribution of Deleuze and Podoroga in the development of a philosophical approach to the specifics of the image of the world and man on the screen with the help of editing is substantiated. Theoretical thought seeks to formulate in discussions about the "meaning" of the author's construction of a cinematic image through the editing principle certain philosophical conclusions and views on life, art, and the problems of human existence. The comparative method used in the study made it possible to compare the "interpretation" of the installation in the works of V. Podoroga, A. Bazin, J. Deleuze and others for a more complete representation and generalization of the essential characteristics of the installation principle of thinking from a philosophical and aesthetic point of view. It is concluded that the philosophical study of the specifics of the montage principle of thinking as an art phenomenon in the creation of a visual and semantic structure with new artistic qualities in the context of philosophical and anthropological issues is relevant and in demand. The identification of a new artistic quality in the installation design requires the author to search for a creative movement with its logical, intuitive and heuristic relationships. The use of cinematographic tools, the editing principle of thinking to comprehend the problems of human existence not only reveals the identity of the author, but also expands the field of research in philosophical anthropology. The philosophical and anthropological interpretation of the montage principle makes it possible to identify not only the core of the author's ideological meanings expressing the individual's attitude to the world, but also the problems of being a person in general, a human creator, an author, since he participates in their formulation and solution by artistic means.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article offers a philosophical interpretation of theoretical concepts devoted to the editing principle of thinking a phenomenon in cinematography, which is based on the creation of a new quality that arises with a purposeful author's combination of frames. The value of the contribution of Deleuze and Podoroga in the development of a philosophical approach to the specifics of the image of the world and man on the screen with the help of editing is substantiated. Theoretical thought seeks to formulate in discussions about the "meaning" of the author's construction of a cinematic image through the editing principle certain philosophical conclusions and views on life, art, and the problems of human existence. The comparative method used in the study made it possible to compare the "interpretation" of the installation in the works of V. Podoroga, A. Bazin, J. Deleuze and others for a more complete representation and generalization of the essential characteristics of the installation principle of thinking from a philosophical and aesthetic point of view. It is concluded that the philosophical study of the specifics of the montage principle of thinking as an art phenomenon in the creation of a visual and semantic structure with new artistic qualities in the context of philosophical and anthropological issues is relevant and in demand. The identification of a new artistic quality in the installation design requires the author to search for a creative movement with its logical, intuitive and heuristic relationships. The use of cinematographic tools, the editing principle of thinking to comprehend the problems of human existence not only reveals the identity of the author, but also expands the field of research in philosophical anthropology. The philosophical and anthropological interpretation of the montage principle makes it possible to identify not only the core of the author's ideological meanings expressing the individual's attitude to the world, but also the problems of being a person in general, a human creator, an author, since he participates in their formulation and solution by artistic means.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Deleuze</kwd><kwd>Podoroga</kwd><kwd>Berdyaev</kwd><kwd>Bazin</kwd><kwd>Yampolsky </kwd><kwd>editing principle of thinking</kwd><kwd>innovation</kwd><kwd>anthropology of cinematography</kwd><kwd>author's will</kwd><kwd>"new man"</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Deleuze</kwd><kwd>Podoroga</kwd><kwd>Berdyaev</kwd><kwd>Bazin</kwd><kwd>Yampolsky </kwd><kwd>editing principle of thinking</kwd><kwd>innovation</kwd><kwd>anthropology of cinematography</kwd><kwd>author's will</kwd><kwd>"new man"</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list><ref id="ref0"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bazen, A. Chto takoe kino? [What is cinema?]. Moscow: Iskusstvo; 1972, 384 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bazen, A. Chto takoe kino? [What is cinema?]. Moscow: Iskusstvo; 1972, 384 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berdyaev, N. A. O russkikh klassikakh [About Russian classics]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola; 1993, 368 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berdyaev, N. A. O russkikh klassikakh [About Russian classics]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola; 1993, 368 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Delez, Zh. Kino [Cinema]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2016, 560 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Delez, Zh. Kino [Cinema]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2016, 560 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Katasonov, V. Yu. Angely i demony literatury. Polemicheskie zametki “neprofessionala” o “literaturnom tsekhe” [Angels and demons
of literature. Polemical notes of a "non-professional" about the "literary workshop"]. Moscow: Kislorod; 2020, 448 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katasonov, V. Yu. Angely i demony literatury. Polemicheskie zametki “neprofessionala” o “literaturnom tsekhe” [Angels and demons
of literature. Polemical notes of a "non-professional" about the "literary workshop"]. Moscow: Kislorod; 2020, 448 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lavrov, P. L. Tri besedy o sovremennom znachenii filosofii [Three conversations about the modern meaning of philosophy]. Mir
filosofii: v dvukh chastyakh [The world of Philosophy: in 2 parts]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1991, part 1, 672 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lavrov, P. L. Tri besedy o sovremennom znachenii filosofii [Three conversations about the modern meaning of philosophy]. Mir
filosofii: v dvukh chastyakh [The world of Philosophy: in 2 parts]. Moscow: Politizdat; 1991, part 1, 672 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malevich, K. S. Chernyy kvadrat [Black Square]. Moscow: AST; 2018, 512 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malevich, K. S. Chernyy kvadrat [Black Square]. Moscow: AST; 2018, 512 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mamardashvili, M. Besedy o myshlenii [Conversations about thinking]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus; 2019, 480 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mamardashvili, M. Besedy o myshlenii [Conversations about thinking]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus; 2019, 480 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Podoroga, V. A. Vtoroy ekran. Sergey Eyzenshteyn i kinematograf nasiliya [The second screen. Sergey Eisenstein and the cinema
of violence]. Moscow: BREUS; 2017, 352 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Podoroga, V. A. Vtoroy ekran. Sergey Eyzenshteyn i kinematograf nasiliya [The second screen. Sergey Eisenstein and the cinema
of violence]. Moscow: BREUS; 2017, 352 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsiolkovskiy, K. E. Filosofiya Vselennoy [Philosophy of the Universe]. Moscow: Eksmo; 2021, 160 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsiolkovskiy, K. E. Filosofiya Vselennoy [Philosophy of the Universe]. Moscow: Eksmo; 2021, 160 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eyzenshteyn, S. Memuary: v dvukh tomakh [Memoirs: in 2 vol.]. Moscow: Museum of Modern Art “Garazh”; 2019, vol. 2, 520 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eyzenshteyn, S. Memuary: v dvukh tomakh [Memoirs: in 2 vol.]. Moscow: Museum of Modern Art “Garazh”; 2019, vol. 2, 520 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yampolskiy, M. B. Revolyutsiya kak sobytie smysla [Revolution as an event of meaning]. Antropologiya revolyutsii [Anthropology
of Revolution]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2009, pp. 17–52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yampolskiy, M. B. Revolyutsiya kak sobytie smysla [Revolution as an event of meaning]. Antropologiya revolyutsii [Anthropology
of Revolution]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2009, pp. 17–52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yaaspers, K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The meaning and purpose of history]. Moscow: Respublika; 1994, 527 p</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yaaspers, K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The meaning and purpose of history]. Moscow: Respublika; 1994, 527 p</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>