<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2205</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54398/1818510X_2022_4_75</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="udс">82</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>Modern approaches to measuring political trust: a review of Russian and foreign scientific literature</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>Modern approaches to measuring political trust: a review of Russian and foreign scientific literature</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0850-7581</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Grishin</surname><given-names>Nikolai V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Grishin</surname><given-names>Nikolai V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>nvgrishin@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3594" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff3594"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Saint Petersburg State University,</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Saint Petersburg State University,</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" /><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-03-13"><day>13</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>09</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></date></history><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2022/issue/4/article/2205">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2022/issue/4/article/2205</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(73)/75-80.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(73)/75-80.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The review article contains an analysis of the main trends in the study of the issues of measuring political trust in domestic and foreign scientific literature. The main attention is paid to the scientific literature of the period of the 2010s and early 2020s: in this period of time, there is a surge in the attention of both domestic and foreign researchers to the issues of measuring trust. The reasons for the growing attention of political trust researchers to the issues of its measurement are revealed. In modern scientific literature, the exceptional methodological importance of solving the problems of measuring trust in order to conduct correct studies of political trust is recognized. The main approaches to the classification of methods for measuring trust are characterized. The prospects of the main approaches to measuring political trust are considered. The prospects and limitations of the technique of a single question when using direct methods of measuring trust are determined. It has been established that the use of several indicators when using direct methods for measuring political trust provides significant advantages, however, the question of the correct definition of the list of these indicators will remain a constant source of controversy. The main scientific problems and achievements in using indirect methods for measuring political trust are characterized. Until now, approaches to measuring political trust have not appeared that could become dominant in science.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The review article contains an analysis of the main trends in the study of the issues of measuring political trust in domestic and foreign scientific literature. The main attention is paid to the scientific literature of the period of the 2010s and early 2020s: in this period of time, there is a surge in the attention of both domestic and foreign researchers to the issues of measuring trust. The reasons for the growing attention of political trust researchers to the issues of its measurement are revealed. In modern scientific literature, the exceptional methodological importance of solving the problems of measuring trust in order to conduct correct studies of political trust is recognized. The main approaches to the classification of methods for measuring trust are characterized. The prospects of the main approaches to measuring political trust are considered. The prospects and limitations of the technique of a single question when using direct methods of measuring trust are determined. It has been established that the use of several indicators when using direct methods for measuring political trust provides significant advantages, however, the question of the correct definition of the list of these indicators will remain a constant source of controversy. The main scientific problems and achievements in using indirect methods for measuring political trust are characterized. Until now, approaches to measuring political trust have not appeared that could become dominant in science.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>political trust</kwd><kwd>public trust</kwd><kwd>trust</kwd><kwd>measurement of trust</kwd><kwd>measurement of political trust</kwd><kwd>methods of measuring trust</kwd><kwd>types of trust</kwd><kwd>elections</kwd><kwd>social exchange</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>political trust</kwd><kwd>public trust</kwd><kwd>trust</kwd><kwd>measurement of trust</kwd><kwd>measurement of political trust</kwd><kwd>methods of measuring trust</kwd><kwd>types of trust</kwd><kwd>elections</kwd><kwd>social exchange</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement>the study was carried out at the Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of
Sciences with the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation and the Expert Institute for Social
Research within the framework of the scientific project № 122101100043-9 "Political Trust of Russian Youth: Formation Mechanisms, State,
Trends and Risks".</funding-statement></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement>the study was carried out at the Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of
Sciences with the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation and the Expert Institute for Social
Research within the framework of the scientific project № 122101100043-9 "Political Trust of Russian Youth: Formation Mechanisms, State,
Trends and Risks".</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list><ref id="ref0"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vasilyeva, M. Yu. Sravnitelnyy analiz podkhodov k izmereniyu doveriya [Comparative analysis of approaches to measuring trust].
Moscow: HSU; 2014, 91 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vasilyeva, M. Yu. Sravnitelnyy analiz podkhodov k izmereniyu doveriya [Comparative analysis of approaches to measuring trust].
Moscow: HSU; 2014, 91 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gulevich, O., Guseva, V. Kak izmerit otnosheniye k politikam? Russkoyazychnyye oprosniki dlya izmereniya politicheskogo doveriya i
politicheskogo tsinizma [How to measure attitude towards politicians? Russian-language questionnaires for measuring political trust and political
cynicism]. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya [Psychological research]. 2022, no. 15 (83), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.54359/ps.v15i83.1140.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gulevich, O., Guseva, V. Kak izmerit otnosheniye k politikam? Russkoyazychnyye oprosniki dlya izmereniya politicheskogo doveriya i
politicheskogo tsinizma [How to measure attitude towards politicians? Russian-language questionnaires for measuring political trust and political
cynicism]. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya [Psychological research]. 2022, no. 15 (83), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.54359/ps.v15i83.1140.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zavershinskiy, K. F. “Politicheskoye doveriye” kak simvolicheskiy istochnik sotsialnykh izmeneniy v politicheskikh setyakh ["Political
trust" as a symbolic source of social changes in political networks]. Politicheskaya ekspertiza: Politeks [Political expertise: Politex]. 2012, no. 3,
pp. 62–75.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zavershinskiy, K. F. “Politicheskoye doveriye” kak simvolicheskiy istochnik sotsialnykh izmeneniy v politicheskikh setyakh ["Political
trust" as a symbolic source of social changes in political networks]. Politicheskaya ekspertiza: Politeks [Political expertise: Politex]. 2012, no. 3,
pp. 62–75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kirilenko, V. P., Alekseyev, G. V. Izmereniye politicheskogo doveriya v usloviyakh sovremennoy demokratii [Measurement of political
trust in the conditions of modern democracy]. Upravlencheskoye konsultirovaniye [Management consulting]. 2021, no. 10, pp. 22–34.
doi: 10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-22-34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirilenko, V. P., Alekseyev, G. V. Izmereniye politicheskogo doveriya v usloviyakh sovremennoy demokratii [Measurement of political
trust in the conditions of modern democracy]. Upravlencheskoye konsultirovaniye [Management consulting]. 2021, no. 10, pp. 22–34.
doi: 10.22394/1726-1139-2021-10-22-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Minina, V. N. Doveriye kak aktiv organizatsii: metodologicheskiye aspekty izmereniya [Trust as an asset of an organization: methodological aspects of measurement]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University; 2009, 73 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Minina, V. N. Doveriye kak aktiv organizatsii: metodologicheskiye aspekty izmereniya [Trust as an asset of an organization: methodological aspects of measurement]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University; 2009, 73 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Noyanzina, O. Ye., Maksimova, S. G., Omelchenko, D. A. Vyrazhennost doveriya k institutam grazhdanskogo obshchestva v regionakh rossiysko-aziatskogo prigranichya [Expression of trust in the institutions of civil society in the regions of the Russian-Asian border].
Society and Security Insights. 2019, no. 2, pp. 13–27.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Noyanzina, O. Ye., Maksimova, S. G., Omelchenko, D. A. Vyrazhennost doveriya k institutam grazhdanskogo obshchestva v regionakh rossiysko-aziatskogo prigranichya [Expression of trust in the institutions of civil society in the regions of the Russian-Asian border].
Society and Security Insights. 2019, no. 2, pp. 13–27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popova, O. V. Regionalnaya identichnost naseleniya v kontekste realizatsii politiki upravleniya doveriyem k politicheskoy vlasti v sovremennoy RF [Regional identity of the population in the context of implementing the policy of managing trust in political power in the modern
Russian Federation]. Rossiya i politicheskiy poryadok v menyayushchemsya mire: tsennosti, instituty, perspektivy [Russia and political order in a
changing world: values, institutions, prospects]. Moscow: Aspekt-Press; 2021, pp. 402–403.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popova, O. V. Regionalnaya identichnost naseleniya v kontekste realizatsii politiki upravleniya doveriyem k politicheskoy vlasti v sovremennoy RF [Regional identity of the population in the context of implementing the policy of managing trust in political power in the modern
Russian Federation]. Rossiya i politicheskiy poryadok v menyayushchemsya mire: tsennosti, instituty, perspektivy [Russia and political order in a
changing world: values, institutions, prospects]. Moscow: Aspekt-Press; 2021, pp. 402–403.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chernitsyna, Ye. N. Politicheskoye doveriye: kak ego izmerit? [Political trust: how to measure it?]. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye
[Public administration]. 2016, no. 52, pp. 130–145.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chernitsyna, Ye. N. Politicheskoye doveriye: kak ego izmerit? [Political trust: how to measure it?]. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye
[Public administration]. 2016, no. 52, pp. 130–145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chernitsyna, Ye. N. Izmereniye politicheskogo doveriya: metody i kriterii [Measurement of political trust: methods and criteria]. Vestnik
Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University]. 2015, no. 12, pp. 63–70.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chernitsyna, Ye. N. Izmereniye politicheskogo doveriya: metody i kriterii [Measurement of political trust: methods and criteria]. Vestnik
Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University]. 2015, no. 12, pp. 63–70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Allum, N., Read, S., Sturgis, P. Evaluating change in social and political trust in Europe using multiple group confirmatory factor
analysis with structured means. Cross cultural analysis: Methods and applications. Ed. by E. Davidov, J. Billiet, P. Schmidt. New York:
Routledge; 2011, 684 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Allum, N., Read, S., Sturgis, P. Evaluating change in social and political trust in Europe using multiple group confirmatory factor
analysis with structured means. Cross cultural analysis: Methods and applications. Ed. by E. Davidov, J. Billiet, P. Schmidt. New York:
Routledge; 2011, 684 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">André, S. Does trust mean the same for migrants and natives? Testing measurement models of political prust with multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Social Indicators Research. 2014, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 963–982. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0246-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">André, S. Does trust mean the same for migrants and natives? Testing measurement models of political prust with multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Social Indicators Research. 2014, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 963–982. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0246-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bauer, P., Freitag, M. Measuring trust. The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Ed. by E. Uslaner. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018, pp. 15–36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bauer, P., Freitag, M. Measuring trust. The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Ed. by E. Uslaner. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018, pp. 15–36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bauer, P. Conceptualizing and Measuring Trust and Trustworthiness. IPSA Committee on Concepts and Methods; 2014, 17 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bauer, P. Conceptualizing and Measuring Trust and Trustworthiness. IPSA Committee on Concepts and Methods; 2014, 17 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bertsou, E. Rethinking political distrust. European Political Science Review. 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 213–230.
doi: 10.1017/S1755773919000080.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bertsou, E. Rethinking political distrust. European Political Science Review. 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 213–230.
doi: 10.1017/S1755773919000080.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chang, E. C. C. A comparative analysis of how corruption erodes institutional trust. Taiwan Journal of Democracy. 2013, vol. 9,
no. 1, pp. 73–92.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chang, E. C. C. A comparative analysis of how corruption erodes institutional trust. Taiwan Journal of Democracy. 2013, vol. 9,
no. 1, pp. 73–92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clausen, B., Kraay, A., Nyiri, Z. Corruption and confidence in public institutions: Evidence from a Global Survey. The World Bank
Economic Review. 2011, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 212–249.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clausen, B., Kraay, A., Nyiri, Z. Corruption and confidence in public institutions: Evidence from a Global Survey. The World Bank
Economic Review. 2011, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 212–249.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coromina, L., Davidov, E. Evaluating measurement invariance for social and political trust in Western Europe over four measurement time points (2002–2008). Research &amp; Methods. 2013, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 35–52. doi: 10.5167/UZH-92161.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coromina, L., Davidov, E. Evaluating measurement invariance for social and political trust in Western Europe over four measurement time points (2002–2008). Research &amp; Methods. 2013, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 35–52. doi: 10.5167/UZH-92161.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Delhey, J., Newton, K., Welzel, C. How general is trust in ‘most people’? Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological
Review. 2011, vol. 76, pp. 786–807. doi: 10.1177/0003122411420817.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Delhey, J., Newton, K., Welzel, C. How general is trust in ‘most people’? Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological
Review. 2011, vol. 76, pp. 786–807. doi: 10.1177/0003122411420817.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feldman, S. The Measurement and Meaning of Trust in Government. Political Methodology. 1983, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 341–354.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Feldman, S. The Measurement and Meaning of Trust in Government. Political Methodology. 1983, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 341–354.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hooghe, M. Why there is basically only one form of political trust. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.
2011, vol. 13, pp. 269–275.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hooghe, M. Why there is basically only one form of political trust. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.
2011, vol. 13, pp. 269–275.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hooghe, M., Marien, S. Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for
law compliance. European Journal of Political Research. 2010, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 267–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hooghe, M., Marien, S. Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for
law compliance. European Journal of Political Research. 2010, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 267–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hutchison, M., Johnson, K. Capacity to trust? Institutional capacity, conflict, and political trust in Africa, 2000–2005. Journal of Peace
Research. 2011, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 737–752. doi: 10.1177/0022343311417981.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hutchison, M., Johnson, K. Capacity to trust? Institutional capacity, conflict, and political trust in Africa, 2000–2005. Journal of Peace
Research. 2011, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 737–752. doi: 10.1177/0022343311417981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru"> Levi, M., Stoker, L. Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science. 2000, vol. 3, pp. 475–507.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en"> Levi, M., Stoker, L. Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science. 2000, vol. 3, pp. 475–507.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marien, S. Measuring political trust across time and space. Political trust: Why context matters. Ed. by S. Zmerli and M. Hooghe.
Colchester: ECPR Press; 2011, pp. 13–47.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marien, S. Measuring political trust across time and space. Political trust: Why context matters. Ed. by S. Zmerli and M. Hooghe.
Colchester: ECPR Press; 2011, pp. 13–47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mishler, W., Rose, R. What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies.
Comparative Political Studies. 2001, vol. 34, pp. 30–62. doi: 10.1177/0010414001034001002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mishler, W., Rose, R. What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies.
Comparative Political Studies. 2001, vol. 34, pp. 30–62. doi: 10.1177/0010414001034001002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rosenthal, A. Submerged for Some? Government Visibility, Race, and American Political Trust. Perspectives on Politics. 2021,
vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1098–1114. doi: 10.1017/S1537592720002200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rosenthal, A. Submerged for Some? Government Visibility, Race, and American Political Trust. Perspectives on Politics. 2021,
vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1098–1114. doi: 10.1017/S1537592720002200.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schaap, D., Scheepers, P. Comparing citizens’ trust in police across European countries: An assessment of cross-country measurement equivalence. International Criminal Justice Review. 2014, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 82–98.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schaap, D., Scheepers, P. Comparing citizens’ trust in police across European countries: An assessment of cross-country measurement equivalence. International Criminal Justice Review. 2014, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 82–98.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schneider, I. Can We Trust Measures of Political Trust? Assessing Measurement Equivalence in Diverse Regime Types. Social Indicators Research. 2017, vol. 133, pp. 963–984. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1400-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schneider, I. Can We Trust Measures of Political Trust? Assessing Measurement Equivalence in Diverse Regime Types. Social Indicators Research. 2017, vol. 133, pp. 963–984. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1400-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Suh, C. Spill-up and spill-over of trust: an extended test of cultural and institutional theories of trust in South Korea. Sociological Forum. 2012, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 504–526. doi: 10.2307/23262119.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Suh, C. Spill-up and spill-over of trust: an extended test of cultural and institutional theories of trust in South Korea. Sociological Forum. 2012, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 504–526. doi: 10.2307/23262119.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">urper, S., Aarts, K. Political Trust and Sophistication: Taking Measurement Seriously. Social Indicators Research. 2017, vol. 130,
no. 1, pp. 415-434. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1182-4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">urper, S., Aarts, K. Political Trust and Sophistication: Taking Measurement Seriously. Social Indicators Research. 2017, vol. 130,
no. 1, pp. 415-434. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1182-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wroe, A., Allen, N., Birch, S. The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption. European Political Science Review.
2013, vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. 175–195. doi: 10.1017/S1755773912000094.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wroe, A., Allen, N., Birch, S. The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption. European Political Science Review.
2013, vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. 175–195. doi: 10.1017/S1755773912000094.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>