<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1998</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>OSCE IN GEORGIA: IN SEARCH FOR A NEW FORMAT</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>OSCE IN GEORGIA: IN SEARCH FOR A NEW FORMAT</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bugaev</surname><given-names>Fedor N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bugaev</surname><given-names>Fedor N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3242" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Turava</surname><given-names>George M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Turava</surname><given-names>George M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3243" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff3242"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Saint Petersburg State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Saint Petersburg State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3243"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">PeopleвЂ™s Friendship University of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">PeopleвЂ™s Friendship University of Russia</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" /><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-04-27"><day>27</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><fpage>107</fpage><lpage>114</lpage><history /><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2021/issue/1/article/1998">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2021/issue/1/article/1998</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/1(66)/107-114.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/1(66)/107-114.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>This article examines the activities of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to resolve the Georgian-Abkhaz and Georgian-Ossetian conflicts. The OSCE is one of the most important structures in ensuring regional stability and security, but in the current conditions it does not use the set of tools at its disposal to an adequate extent. The high conflict potential of the South Caucasus region and the specificity of the contradictions between the parties do not allow the use of identical formats for the settlement. This article conducts a retrospective analysis of the OSCE's participation in the conflicts in Georgia, identify the weak and strong sides of the organization's existing tools and propose new mechanisms and initiatives for the region under consideration that are in the OSCE's arsenal, but need more flexibility and adaptability to specific cases. Thus, the paper is aimed primarily at rethinking the role of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe in the peaceful settlement of conflicts in Georgia in the current geopolitical conditions through a comprehensive assessment of the OSCE's potential in the specified region.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article examines the activities of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to resolve the Georgian-Abkhaz and Georgian-Ossetian conflicts. The OSCE is one of the most important structures in ensuring regional stability and security, but in the current conditions it does not use the set of tools at its disposal to an adequate extent. The high conflict potential of the South Caucasus region and the specificity of the contradictions between the parties do not allow the use of identical formats for the settlement. This article conducts a retrospective analysis of the OSCE's participation in the conflicts in Georgia, identify the weak and strong sides of the organization's existing tools and propose new mechanisms and initiatives for the region under consideration that are in the OSCE's arsenal, but need more flexibility and adaptability to specific cases. Thus, the paper is aimed primarily at rethinking the role of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe in the peaceful settlement of conflicts in Georgia in the current geopolitical conditions through a comprehensive assessment of the OSCE's potential in the specified region.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>OSCE</kwd><kwd>Georgia</kwd><kwd>South Caucasus</kwd><kwd>conflict</kwd><kwd>security</kwd><kwd>set of tools</kwd><kwd>peaceful settlement</kwd><kwd>observers</kwd><kwd>field mission</kwd><kwd>mediator</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>OSCE</kwd><kwd>Georgia</kwd><kwd>South Caucasus</kwd><kwd>conflict</kwd><kwd>security</kwd><kwd>set of tools</kwd><kwd>peaceful settlement</kwd><kwd>observers</kwd><kwd>field mission</kwd><kwd>mediator</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list /></back></article>