Politics and law in modern education are presented as two completely different disciplines, based on different areas of interest and solvable range of tasks. But, it is worth noting that in pre-revolutionary history, politics and law were not divisible, and attempts to crush state science could not be completed until it was impossible to consider one without the other. The post-revolutionary scientists of the Soviet era have managed to delineate competencies. But despite today's division of scientific competencies between politics and law, there remains a lot of interdependence.The article shows the possibility of integrating politics and law into a single indivisible science, which is capable of solving a number of applied political and legal tasks. The genesis and evolution of national state science, joint and separate competencies of state science in university disciplines are analyzed, which helps to consider the divisible and indivisible in national state science from different sides.

Politics and law in modern education are presented as two completely different disciplines, based on different areas of interest and solvable range of tasks. But, it is worth noting that in pre-revolutionary history, politics and law were not divisible, and attempts to crush state science could not be completed until it was impossible to consider one without the other. The post-revolutionary scientists of the Soviet era have managed to delineate competencies. But despite today's division of scientific competencies between politics and law, there remains a lot of interdependence.The article shows the possibility of integrating politics and law into a single indivisible science, which is capable of solving a number of applied political and legal tasks. The genesis and evolution of national state science, joint and separate competencies of state science in university disciplines are analyzed, which helps to consider the divisible and indivisible in national state science from different sides.