<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1768</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>Review of the monograph «Arctic Law and Governance. The Role of China and Finland» edited by Timo Koivurova, QIN Tianbao, Sebastien Duyck, Tapio NykГ¤nen (Hart Publ., 2017, 312 p.)</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>Review of the monograph «Arctic Law and Governance. The Role of China and Finland» edited by Timo Koivurova, QIN Tianbao, Sebastien Duyck, Tapio NykГ¤nen (Hart Publ., 2017, 312 p.)</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Lebedeva</surname><given-names>I. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lebedeva</surname><given-names>I. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>irenalebedeva@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2884" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Dzhunusova</surname><given-names>J. N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dzhunusova</surname><given-names>J. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>astu@astu.org</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2885" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff2884"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Caspian Institute of Sea &amp; River Transport</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Caspian Institute of Sea &amp; River Transport</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2885"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Astrakhan State Technical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Astrakhan State Technical University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" /><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2018-12-24"><day>24</day><month>12</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>212</lpage><history /><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2018/issue/4/article/1768">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2018/issue/4/article/1768</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(57)/211-212.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(57)/211-212.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>This monograph is the result of cooperation between the Northern Institute of Environmental Protection and Minorities (Arctic Center, University of Lapland) and researchers from Wuhan University. The international team of scientists set a goal to identify the similarities and differences between the positions of Finland (as a member state of the EU) and China with regard to law and governance in the Arctic. The monograph compares the legal and political positions of Finland and China in specific policy areas related to the Arctic, including maritime sovereignty, research, marine protected areas, the Svalbard Treaty and cooperation of the Arctic Council. Based on these findings, the authors propose general conclusions on Finnish and Chinese approaches to Arctic management and international law, as well as new theoretical information about Arctic management.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This monograph is the result of cooperation between the Northern Institute of Environmental Protection and Minorities (Arctic Center, University of Lapland) and researchers from Wuhan University. The international team of scientists set a goal to identify the similarities and differences between the positions of Finland (as a member state of the EU) and China with regard to law and governance in the Arctic. The monograph compares the legal and political positions of Finland and China in specific policy areas related to the Arctic, including maritime sovereignty, research, marine protected areas, the Svalbard Treaty and cooperation of the Arctic Council. Based on these findings, the authors propose general conclusions on Finnish and Chinese approaches to Arctic management and international law, as well as new theoretical information about Arctic management.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>арктический транспортный коридор</kwd><kwd>арктическое управление</kwd><kwd>судоходство</kwd><kwd>ресурсы</kwd><kwd>международное право</kwd><kwd>Arctic transport corridor</kwd><kwd>Arctic management</kwd><kwd>shipping</kwd><kwd>resources</kwd><kwd>international law</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>арктический транспортный коридор</kwd><kwd>арктическое управление</kwd><kwd>судоходство</kwd><kwd>ресурсы</kwd><kwd>международное право</kwd><kwd>Arctic transport corridor</kwd><kwd>Arctic management</kwd><kwd>shipping</kwd><kwd>resources</kwd><kwd>international law</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list /></back></article>