<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1328</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>The evolution of the peasant economy and the adjustment problems of the cultural revolution in the 1926-1928</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>The evolution of the peasant economy and the adjustment problems of the cultural revolution in the 1926-1928</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Turitsyn</surname><given-names>I.V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Turitsyn</surname><given-names>I.V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>info@helri.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2276" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kholodny</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kholodny</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>info@helri.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2277" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff2276"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Research Institute for History, Economics and Law</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Research Institute for History, Economics and Law</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2277"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Research Institute for History, Economics and Law</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Research Institute for History, Economics and Law</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>40</lpage><history /><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2015/issue/4/article/1328">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2015/issue/4/article/1328</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(45)/37-40.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/4(45)/37-40.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article examines the impact of the transition to the accelerated construction of socialism in the formulation and solution of problems of the cultural revolution in the countryside. It is shown that in 1927 there was a fundamental reversal of party politics. Before that time, the main concern of the CPSU (b) was closer to the middle peasants, then 1927-1928 - with the poor, and agricultural laborers. As a result, the adjustment problems of the «cultural revolution» led to the fore two key areas of the Bolshevik policy in the countryside. In the area of industrial promotion was a transition from «uplifters» an aggressive propaganda of collectivization. In the political sphere, while limiting the admission of peasants into the party, the focus has shifted from the poor and middle peasants on a farm laborer.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article examines the impact of the transition to the accelerated construction of socialism in the formulation and solution of problems of the cultural revolution in the countryside. It is shown that in 1927 there was a fundamental reversal of party politics. Before that time, the main concern of the CPSU (b) was closer to the middle peasants, then 1927-1928 - with the poor, and agricultural laborers. As a result, the adjustment problems of the «cultural revolution» led to the fore two key areas of the Bolshevik policy in the countryside. In the area of industrial promotion was a transition from «uplifters» an aggressive propaganda of collectivization. In the political sphere, while limiting the admission of peasants into the party, the focus has shifted from the poor and middle peasants on a farm laborer.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>большевистская модернизация</kwd><kwd>культурная революция</kwd><kwd>крестьянство</kwd><kwd>шефство города над деревней</kwd><kwd>середняки</kwd><kwd>батраки</kwd><kwd>Bolshevik modernization</kwd><kwd>the cultural revolution</kwd><kwd>the peasantry</kwd><kwd>the patronage of the city over the countryside</kwd><kwd>the middle peasants</kwd><kwd>laborers</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>большевистская модернизация</kwd><kwd>культурная революция</kwd><kwd>крестьянство</kwd><kwd>шефство города над деревней</kwd><kwd>середняки</kwd><kwd>батраки</kwd><kwd>Bolshevik modernization</kwd><kwd>the cultural revolution</kwd><kwd>the peasantry</kwd><kwd>the patronage of the city over the countryside</kwd><kwd>the middle peasants</kwd><kwd>laborers</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list /></back></article>