<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1274</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>Political culture and cultural policy in terms of world-sytem analysis</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>Political culture and cultural policy in terms of world-sytem analysis</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Philipenko</surname><given-names>Evgeniy Valerevich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Philipenko</surname><given-names>Evgeniy Valerevich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>abkbgtyrj@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2221" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff2221"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><issue>3</issue><fpage>154</fpage><lpage>161</lpage><history /><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2015/issue/3/article/1274">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2015/issue/3/article/1274</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/3(44)/154-161.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/3(44)/154-161.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article investigates political culture. The methodology of I.Wallerstein's world-system analysis is employed as a foundation of this investigation. There are some disadvantages of G. Almond - S. Verba's conception are considered. Significant problem of contradictions between classes («class struggle») and status groups is resolving in world-system perspective. Geoculture is cultural modus of modern world-system and a way of its legitimation. Different standards of legitimate cultural forms are caused by geoculture. Moreover, geoculture co-opts different ways of cultural resistance. The paper demonstrates, that universalism and particularism (as racism and sexism) has ambivalent influence on political culture, political behavior and cooptation different social groups into different zones of the world-system («core», «semi-periphery» and «periphery»). Culture is a battleground for preferences inside the world-system. Nation is result of class struggle and political design of the modern world-system. Social changes are used to covering antagonistic character of process inside world-system. That's why conception of «permanent revolution» can be used as explanatory model for mode of legitimation and masking current world-system's political structure. From the standpoint of geoculture cultural policy is not the only type of interaction between culture and politics. Alternative view is cultural exploitation for explanation of political changes and legitimation of political process.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article investigates political culture. The methodology of I.Wallerstein's world-system analysis is employed as a foundation of this investigation. There are some disadvantages of G. Almond - S. Verba's conception are considered. Significant problem of contradictions between classes («class struggle») and status groups is resolving in world-system perspective. Geoculture is cultural modus of modern world-system and a way of its legitimation. Different standards of legitimate cultural forms are caused by geoculture. Moreover, geoculture co-opts different ways of cultural resistance. The paper demonstrates, that universalism and particularism (as racism and sexism) has ambivalent influence on political culture, political behavior and cooptation different social groups into different zones of the world-system («core», «semi-periphery» and «periphery»). Culture is a battleground for preferences inside the world-system. Nation is result of class struggle and political design of the modern world-system. Social changes are used to covering antagonistic character of process inside world-system. That's why conception of «permanent revolution» can be used as explanatory model for mode of legitimation and masking current world-system's political structure. From the standpoint of geoculture cultural policy is not the only type of interaction between culture and politics. Alternative view is cultural exploitation for explanation of political changes and legitimation of political process.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>мир-системный анализ</kwd><kwd>И. Валлерстайн</kwd><kwd>центр</kwd><kwd>периферия</kwd><kwd>полупериферия</kwd><kwd>геокультура</kwd><kwd>классы</kwd><kwd>классовая борьба</kwd><kwd>статусные группы</kwd><kwd>универсализм</kwd><kwd>антиуниверсализм</kwd><kwd>расизм</kwd><kwd>сексизм</kwd><kwd>меритократия</kwd><kwd>антисистемные движения</kwd><kwd>«перманентная революция»</kwd><kwd>культурная политика</kwd><kwd>world-system analysis</kwd><kwd>I. Wallerstein</kwd><kwd>“core”</kwd><kwd>“semi-periphery”</kwd><kwd>“periphery” geoculture</kwd><kwd>class</kwd><kwd>class struggle</kwd><kwd>status groups</kwd><kwd>universalism</kwd><kwd>particularism</kwd><kwd>racism</kwd><kwd>sexism</kwd><kwd>meritocracy</kwd><kwd>antisystem movements</kwd><kwd>“permanent revolution”</kwd><kwd>cultural policy</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>мир-системный анализ</kwd><kwd>И. Валлерстайн</kwd><kwd>центр</kwd><kwd>периферия</kwd><kwd>полупериферия</kwd><kwd>геокультура</kwd><kwd>классы</kwd><kwd>классовая борьба</kwd><kwd>статусные группы</kwd><kwd>универсализм</kwd><kwd>антиуниверсализм</kwd><kwd>расизм</kwd><kwd>сексизм</kwd><kwd>меритократия</kwd><kwd>антисистемные движения</kwd><kwd>«перманентная революция»</kwd><kwd>культурная политика</kwd><kwd>world-system analysis</kwd><kwd>I. Wallerstein</kwd><kwd>“core”</kwd><kwd>“semi-periphery”</kwd><kwd>“periphery” geoculture</kwd><kwd>class</kwd><kwd>class struggle</kwd><kwd>status groups</kwd><kwd>universalism</kwd><kwd>particularism</kwd><kwd>racism</kwd><kwd>sexism</kwd><kwd>meritocracy</kwd><kwd>antisystem movements</kwd><kwd>“permanent revolution”</kwd><kwd>cultural policy</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list /></back></article>