<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kaspy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">THE CASPIAN REGION: politics, economics, culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic" /><issn publication-format="print">1818-510X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="ru">Астраханский государственный университет им. В. Н. Татищева</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">872</article-id><title-group xml:lang="ru"><article-title>Silence role in ontology of language of Wittgenstein and Heidegger</article-title></title-group><title-group xml:lang="en"><article-title>Silence role in ontology of language of Wittgenstein and Heidegger</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Medvedev</surname><given-names>Nikolay V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Medvedev</surname><given-names>Nikolay V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>philosophy.tsu@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1675" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Fedotova</surname><given-names>Yekaterina Yu.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Fedotova</surname><given-names>Yekaterina Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>philosophy.tsu@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1676" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1675"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff1676"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><fpage>199</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><history /><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2015/issue/1/article/872">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/en/archive/2015/issue/1/article/872</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/1(42)/199-209.pdf" content-type="pdf">https://kaspy.asu-edu.ru/storage/kaspy/archive/1(42)/199-209.pdf</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article deals with comparative analysis of the views of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Martin Heidegger in the definition of the role of silence in the ontological structure of language. Despite the fact that Wittgenstein and Heidegger are representatives of two opposed traditions of philosophizing - analytical and existential-hermeneutic, there are many similar features in the analysis of linguistic thinking in their reasoning. The study shows that Wittgenstein and Heidegger were unanimous in their belief that thought can fully express itself only through speaking and silence. While Wittgenstein considers silence as a way to avoid nonsense when one tries to say something that cannot be clearly expressed in language, Heidegger defines silence as a «source of speech» since language is based on silence. When language is not able to express a thought, silence comes to replace it. Consequently, silence as well as language is a way of expressing thought. The authors reveal not only similarities but also significant differences in the approaches of Wittgenstein and Heidegger in their understanding and interpreting the concepts of «language» and «silence».</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with comparative analysis of the views of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Martin Heidegger in the definition of the role of silence in the ontological structure of language. Despite the fact that Wittgenstein and Heidegger are representatives of two opposed traditions of philosophizing - analytical and existential-hermeneutic, there are many similar features in the analysis of linguistic thinking in their reasoning. The study shows that Wittgenstein and Heidegger were unanimous in their belief that thought can fully express itself only through speaking and silence. While Wittgenstein considers silence as a way to avoid nonsense when one tries to say something that cannot be clearly expressed in language, Heidegger defines silence as a «source of speech» since language is based on silence. When language is not able to express a thought, silence comes to replace it. Consequently, silence as well as language is a way of expressing thought. The authors reveal not only similarities but also significant differences in the approaches of Wittgenstein and Heidegger in their understanding and interpreting the concepts of «language» and «silence».</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Витгенштейн</kwd><kwd>Хайдеггер</kwd><kwd>философия языка</kwd><kwd>молчание</kwd><kwd>язык</kwd><kwd>речь</kwd><kwd>мышление</kwd><kwd>бытие</kwd><kwd>Wittgenstein</kwd><kwd>Heidegger</kwd><kwd>philosophy of language</kwd><kwd>silence</kwd><kwd>language</kwd><kwd>speech</kwd><kwd>thought</kwd><kwd>being</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Витгенштейн</kwd><kwd>Хайдеггер</kwd><kwd>философия языка</kwd><kwd>молчание</kwd><kwd>язык</kwd><kwd>речь</kwd><kwd>мышление</kwd><kwd>бытие</kwd><kwd>Wittgenstein</kwd><kwd>Heidegger</kwd><kwd>philosophy of language</kwd><kwd>silence</kwd><kwd>language</kwd><kwd>speech</kwd><kwd>thought</kwd><kwd>being</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement /></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement /></funding-group></article-meta></front><body /><back><ref-list /></back></article>